Search results
One result was Bruner’s landmark book The Process of Education (1960). It developed some of the key themes of that meeting and was an crucial factor in the generation of a range of educational programmes and experiments in the 1960s.
Feb 1, 2024 · In 1960 Bruner’s text, The Process of Education was published. The main premise of Bruner’s text was that students are active learners who construct their own knowledge. Readiness. Bruner (1960) opposed Piaget’s notion of readiness. He argued that schools waste time trying to match the complexity of subject material to a child’s ...
In the 1960s Jerome Bruner developed a theory of cognitive growth. His approach (in contrast to Piaget) looked to environmental and experiential factors. Bruner suggested that intellectual ability developed in stages through step-by-step changes in how the mind is used.
- 190KB
- 6
In this classic argument for curriculum reform in early education, Jerome Bruner shows that the basic concepts of science and the humanities can be grasped intuitively at a very early age.
- illustrated, reprint
- Jerome Bruner
- 0674710010, 9780674710016
In this classic argument for curriculum reform in early education, Jerome Bruner shows that the basic concepts of science and the humanities can be grasped intu...
Process of Education was a part was based on a formula of faith: that learning was what students wanted to do, that they wanted to achieve an expertise in some particular subject matter. Their motivation was taken for granted. It also accepted the tacit assumption that everybody who came to these curricula in the schools al
People also ask
What was a result of Bruner's 'process of Education'?
What does Bruner say about education?
How did Jerome Bruner impact education?
Who wrote the process of Education?
Why did the educational tide move away from Jerome Bruner?
What is the main premise of Bruner's text?
Results revealed a significant main effect for type of instruction, and regression analysis suggested that the type of feedback that students received did not predict students’ science process posttest scores.