Yahoo Web Search

Search results

      • He developed his doctrine by drawing deductions from a principle he judged incontrovertible: That which is, is. And he grasped the essential point that if a valid argument is based on true premises, then its conclusion—no matter how unpalatable or contrary to our expectations and beliefs—must be true.
      library.biblicalarchaeology.org/department/origins-quod-erat-demonstrandum/
  1. Mark 3:24. Now, in order to make good this πῶς δύναται, (i.e. οὐ δύναται κ. τ. λ.), there come, linked on by the simple and (not γάρ), two illustrative analogues (ἐν παραβολαῖς), after which at Mark 3:26, but likewise by the simple and, not by a particle of inference, is added the point, quod erat ...

    • 23 Commentaries

      Mark 3:23. προσκαλεσάμενος: Jesus, not overawed by the...

    • 22 Parallel Greek Texts

      Berean Greek New Testament 2016 Καὶ οἱ γραμματεῖς οἱ ἀπὸ...

    • 17 Context

      February 10 Morning The light of the body is the eye:...

    • 22 NLT

      22 NLT - Mark 3:22 Commentaries: The scribes who came down...

    • 22 NASB

      22 NASB - Mark 3:22 Commentaries: The scribes who came down...

    • 22 ESV

      22 ESV - Mark 3:22 Commentaries: The scribes who came down...

    • 22 KJV

      22 KJV - Mark 3:22 Commentaries: The scribes who came down...

    • 22 NIV

      22 NIV - Mark 3:22 Commentaries: The scribes who came down...

  2. This is the conclusion of John’s testimony, that in which all the particulars centre, as the quod erat demonstrandum—the fact to be demonstrated : I saw, and bore record, that this is the Son of God. (1.)

  3. There it ushers in the more particular record of Christ’s preaching (Matt. 5:1-7:29) and of his cures (Matt. 8:1-9:38), and here it is elegantly repeated in the close of these instances, as the quod erat demonstrandum—the point to be proved; as if the evangelist should say, “Now I hope I have made it out, by an induction of particulars ...

  4. From all this Paul infers that it is in vain to look for justification by the works of the law, and that it is to be had only by faith, which is the point he has been all along proving, from Rom. 1:17; and which he lays down as the summary of his discourse, with a quod erat demonstrandum—which was to be demonstrated.

  5. It begins and ends with the same acknowledgment of the transcendent excellency of God's name. It is proposed for proof that God's name is excellent in all the earth, and then it is repeated as proved (with a "quod erat demonstrandum"-which was to be demonstrated) in the last verse. For the proof of God's glory the psalmist gives instances of ...

  6. It is proposed for proof (Psalms 8:1) that God's name is excellent in all the earth, and then it is repeated as proved (with a "quod erat demonstrandum"--which was to be demonstrated) in the Psalms 8:9. For the proof of God's glory the psalmist gives instances of his goodness to man; for God's goodness is his glory.

  7. Origins: Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Aristotle was the first thinker to know how he was thinking logically. When did people begin to think logically? There is no answer to this question.

  1. People also search for