Search results
ἥμαρτ., and consequently a mere clumsy argument in a circle, which again assumes the assertion to be proved—id quod erat demonstrandum—in the phenomenon brought forward in Romans 5:14: and moreover utterly breaks down through the proposition that sin is not imputed in the absence of law.
- 14 Commentaries
Romans 5:14. Nevertheless — Though the law was not yet given...
- 13 Parallel Greek Texts
Berean Greek New Testament 2016 ἄχρι γὰρ νόμου ἁμαρτία ἦν ἐν...
- ICC
BLISSFUL CONSEQUENCES OF JUSTIFICATION 5:1-11. The state...
- Lange
Cocceius: ‘ Hœc est gloriatio fidelium, quod persuasum...
- Homiletics
Bible > Pulpit Commentary Homiletics > Romans 5 Romans 5...
- SCO
Bible > Scofield Reference Notes > Romans 5 Romans 5...
- MHC
5:15-19 Through one man's offence, all mankind are exposed...
- Haydock
Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary. Rom 5:1 apostle proceeds...
- 14 Commentaries
There it ushers in the more particular record of Christ’s preaching (Matt. 5:1-7:29) and of his cures (Matt. 8:1-9:38), and here it is elegantly repeated in the close of these instances, as the quod erat demonstrandum—the point to be proved; as if the evangelist should say, “Now I hope I have made it out, by an induction of particulars ...
This is the conclusion of John’s testimony, that in which all the particulars centre, as the quod erat demonstrandum—the fact to be demonstrated (John 1:34): I saw, and bore record, that this is the Son of God. (1.) The truth asserted is, that this is the Son of God.
There it ushers in the more particular record of Christ’s preaching (Matthew 5-7) and of his cures (Matthew 8 and 9), and here it is elegantly repeated in the close of these instances, as the quod erat demonstrandum–the point to be proved; as if the evangelist should say,
Verses 19–31. From all this Paul infers that it is in vain to look for justification by the works of the law, and that it is to be had only by faith, which is the point he has been all along proving, from Rom. 1:17; and which he lays down (Rom. 3:28) as the summary of his discourse, with a quod erat demonstrandum—which was to be demonstrated.
It begins and ends with the same acknowledgment of the transcendent excellency of God's name. It is proposed for proof that God's name is excellent in all the earth, and then it is repeated as proved (with a "quod erat demonstrandum"-which was to be demonstrated) in the last verse. For the proof of God's glory the psalmist gives instances of ...
This discourse concerning those two animals was brought in to prove that it is God only who can look upon proud men and abase them, bring them low and tread them down, and hide them in the dust (ch. 40:11-13), and so it concludes with a quod erat demonstrandum-which was to be demonstrated; there is one that beholds all high things, and, wherein ...
