Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. lawtutor.co.uk › articles › the-doctrine-of-precedentThe Doctrine of Precedent - Law Tutor

   lawtutor.co.uk › articles › the-doctrine-of-precedent

   • Cached

   May 13, 2023 · The common law system is distinguished by the doctrine of “stare decisis”, translated from Latin as “stand by what has been decided”, or binding precedent. It is a principle of practice, built up through the common law since its inception in medieval times and is made up from both custom and judge-made law (Lawson, C.M, 1982).

2. hallellis.co.uk › doctrine-of-precedent-court-casesDoctrine of Precedent & Binding Authorities: How it Works

   hallellis.co.uk › doctrine-of-precedent-court-cases

   • Cached

   The common law doctrine of precedent is applied by courts to promote predictability and consistency of judicial decision-making. The application of precedents is the main factor in the way the law is applied equally to all.

3. studyrocket.co.uk › revision › a-level-law-aqaJudicial Precedent – A Level Law AQA Revision – Study Rocket

   studyrocket.co.uk › revision › a-level-law-aqa

   • Cached

   The doctrine of Judicial Precedent is founded on the principle of ‘stare decisis’, meaning to stand by the decision. Essentially it refers to the idea that once a court makes a decision, both they and other courts beneath them are bound by that decision, except for in certain, limited circumstances. This means that cases which are alike are ...

4. e-lawresources.co.uk › Judicial-precedentJudicial precedent - e-lawresources.co.uk

   e-lawresources.co.uk › Judicial-precedent

   • Cached

   The doctrine of judicial precedent is the body of rules which form the basis of common law (case Law). It consists of the principles of stare decisis, binding precedent in the form of ratio decidendi, and persuasive precedents including obiter dicta and the hierachy of the courts.

5. www.lexisnexis.co.uk › legal › guidanceCommercial Court—list of common ground and issues

   www.lexisnexis.co.uk › legal › guidance

   This Practice Note explains the requirements in relation to the list of common ground and issues required in the Commercial Court for a Case management conference (CMC) pursuant to the Commercial Court Guide, paras D5.1–D5.5.

6. www.gov.uk › government › publicationsProcedural Guide: Planning appeals – England - GOV.UK

   www.gov.uk › government › publications

   • Cached

   Sep 17, 2024 · The statement of common ground should clearly identify matters that are agreed between the appellant and the LPA. It should then identify matters that are in dispute (uncommon ground).

7. People also ask

   Should judicial review be a common ground?

   • What ought to be common ground, however, is that the legitimacy of judicial review will not be enhanced by setting Ministers and public authorities up to fail by measuring them against unduly demanding criteria.

   The UK Supreme Court has confirmed the principles for judicial review

   www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/the-uk-supreme-court-has-confirmed-the-principles-for-judicial-review-of-policies

   See all results for this question

   What is a statement of Common Ground?

   • 13.2.2. A statement of common ground is essential to ensure that the evidence considered at a hearing or an inquiry focuses on the areas of disagreement between the appellant and the LPA. This should help to focus the parties’ statements of case and, if the appeal is following the inquiry procedure, proofs of evidence, on areas of disagreement.

   Procedural Guide: Planning appeals – England - GOV.UK

   www.gov.uk/government/publications/planning-appeals-procedural-guide/f90d5f21-de2c-43cd-b743-6c81b9a1b70f

   See all results for this question

   What is the list of common ground and issues?

   • The list of common ground and issues is a case management tool that allows the Commercial Court to define the scope of factual and expert evidence and of disclosure, and to consider whether issues should be determined summarily or preliminary issues should be determined (Commercial Court Guide, paras D2.1 (c), D5.4 and E1.2).

   Commercial Court—list of common ground and issues

   www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/commercial-court-list-of-common-ground-issues

   See all results for this question

   What is a draft statement of Common Ground?

   • A draft statement of common ground is a written statement containing factual information about the proposal which the appellant reasonably considers will not be disputed by the LPA. 13.1.3. We advise the appellant to discuss the draft statement of common ground with the LPA before they make their appeal. 13.2. Agreed statement of common ground

   Procedural Guide: Planning appeals – England - GOV.UK

   www.gov.uk/government/publications/planning-appeals-procedural-guide/f90d5f21-de2c-43cd-b743-6c81b9a1b70f

   See all results for this question

   How long does it take to get a statement of Common Ground?

   • 13.2.1. Once the appeal is made the appellant and the LPA must prepare an agreed statement of common ground together. The LPA must ensure that we and any statutory party (See 10.2.4 and 11.2.5) receive a copy of it within 5 weeks of the start date. 13.2.2.

   Procedural Guide: Planning appeals – England - GOV.UK

   www.gov.uk/government/publications/planning-appeals-procedural-guide/f90d5f21-de2c-43cd-b743-6c81b9a1b70f

   See all results for this question

   What does Lord Scarman say about the courts?

   • Lord Scarman stated in McLoughlin v O’Brian (1982) that the very function of the courts is to make judgements based on principle alone and if it amounts to socially unacceptable results then Parliament will bear the responsibility to change that through legislation.

   The Doctrine of Precedent - Law Tutor

   lawtutor.co.uk/articles/the-doctrine-of-precedent

   See all results for this question

8. www.kingsleynapley.co.uk › insights › blogsThe UK Supreme Court has confirmed the principles for ...

   www.kingsleynapley.co.uk › insights › blogs

   • Cached

   Aug 6, 2021 · What ought to be common ground, however, is that the legitimacy of judicial review will not be enhanced by setting Ministers and public authorities up to fail by measuring them against unduly demanding criteria.