Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 3, 2020 · Process rights can be pursued by means of active advocacy in pursuit of ‘minimum intervention’, in the form of diversion out of the justice system, and towards other extra-judicial models of intervention to resolve any problems associated with a reported offence.

    • Login

      Process rights can be pursued by means of active advocacy in...

    • Forgotten your password

      We would like to show you a description here but the site...

    • SAGE Journals

      justice’ model of diversion must ground its arguments in...

  2. Mar 15, 2021 · Law student and GMLC’s campaign volunteer lead, Hoejong Jeong, considers the barriers that stand in the way of ordinary people getting access to justice, looking at three recent case studies in the news. As the cases show, without access to legal aid or proper legal advice, domestic abuse survivors and detained migrants struggle to protect ...

  3. Introduction. Point-of-arrest youth diversion gives young people the chance to avoid both formal criminal justice processing and a criminal record, in return for the completion of community-based interventions. Youth diversion is an increasingly well-embedded practice in England and Wales: research by the Centre for Justice Innovation in 2019 ...

    • 226KB
    • 10
  4. justice’ model of diversion must ground its arguments in principles of children’s rights and the values of inclusion and anti-oppressive practice. Keywords

  5. Jan 23, 2024 · Diversion could be conceptualized in terms of a reduction of the severity of the sanction applied in criminal justice proceedings, such as the replacement of custody with a community-based alternative, or in terms of a decision not to prosecute someone for a particular offense.

  6. 1. Research evidence strongly suggests that youth diversion can: > Reduce reofending: it is a vital tool in fulfilling the principal statutory aim of the youth justice system, i.e. to prevent ofending;5.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jun 11, 2018 · With a reduction of over two-thirds in the number of young people in custody from 2008 to 2015 (Ministry of Justice/Youth Justice Board, 2016), and substantially increased use of a range of diversionary options at the ‘front end’ of the system, a clear trend seems to have been established (Bateman, 2014, 2017).