Search results
Apr 18, 2017 · In a two-part series on The Sound of Ideas, we'll examine school funding and the legacy of DeRolph vs State, the lawsuit that prompted the Superme Court ruling. Then, civil rights photojournalist Matt Herron discusses the exhibit he curated at the Maltz Museum called, "This Light of Ours."
- Rachel Rood
Mar 24, 2021 · Charters and vouchers divert state funding out of school district budgets and force voters to replace this funding with additional local operating levies. How is that fair and equitable?
DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. [1]
Dec 14, 2008 · To fully understand the DeRolph cases, they must be put into context of the constitutional framework that protects education in Ohio, the history of Ohio school financing, and the Ohio Supreme Court’s earlier school-funding decision in Board of Education v. Walter.10. A. The Right to Education in Ohio.
- Jessica Ice
- 2020
In 1997, the Ohio Supreme Court heard arguments in DeRolph v. State. The Court examined communities’ reliance on property taxes for funding sources and the argument that Ohio violated the state’s constitution’s clause that mandates “a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state.” The DeRolph court
Mar 24, 2017 · Six years after high school freshman Nathan DeRolph filed his suit, justices ruled 4-3 that Ohio’s funding method failed to provide for the “thorough and efficient” system of public schools required by Ohio’s constitution.
The Supremacy Clause of the federal Constitution makes federal law paramount over the contrary positions of state officials; the power of federal courts to enforce federal law thus presupposes some authority to order state officials to comply.
