Search results
DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. [1]
Apr 18, 2017 · In a two-part series on The Sound of Ideas, we'll examine school funding and the legacy of DeRolph vs State, the lawsuit that prompted the Superme Court ruling. Then, civil rights photojournalist Matt Herron discusses the exhibit he curated at the Maltz Museum called, "This Light of Ours."
- Rachel Rood
Mar 24, 2021 · Charters and vouchers divert state funding out of school district budgets and force voters to replace this funding with additional local operating levies. How is that fair and equitable?
The Supremacy Clause of the federal Constitution makes federal law paramount over the contrary positions of state officials; the power of federal courts to enforce federal law thus presupposes some authority to order state officials to comply.
Facts This case involves a constitutional challenge to Ohio’s system of funding public elementary and secondary education. Plaintiffs argued that...
Mar 24, 2017 · Six years after high school freshman Nathan DeRolph filed his suit, justices ruled 4-3 that Ohio’s funding method failed to provide for the “thorough and efficient” system of public schools required by Ohio’s constitution.
Mar 24, 2017 · Six years after high school freshman Nathan DeRolph filed his suit, justices ruled 4-3 that Ohio’s funding method failed to provide for the “thorough and efficient” system of public schools required by Ohio’s constitution.
