Yahoo Web Search

  1. We've got your back with eBay money-back guarantee. Enjoy Case law book you can trust. Find the deal you deserve on eBay. Discover discounts from sellers across the globe.

    • Fashion

      The World is Your Closet.

      Shop Your Top Fashion Brands.

    • Gift Vouchers

      Discover our selection

      of-exceptionally priced gifts.

    • Sporting Goods

      Are You Ready to Play Like a Pro?

      eBay Has Outstanding Gear For You!

    • Motors

      New and Used Vehicles and Parts.

      Find Items from Every Automaker.

Search results

  1. Apr 28, 2016 · Noun. The law as established in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition. Origin. 1860-1865 English common law. What is Case Law. Statutory laws are those created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels.

  2. Covering cases from the late 1700s through the 1920s, HeinOnlines Early American Case Law database is a robust, fully searchable online archive designed for researchers interested in American legal history.

  3. Oct 11, 2012 · Supreme Court cases that changed America —. United States v. Windsor (2013): When her wife died in 2009, Edith Windsor, 84, was forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate...

    • The Case of Proclamations, 1610
    • Entick V Carrington, 1765
    • R V Dudley and Stephens, 1884
    • Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, 1893
    • Donoghue and Stevenson, 1932
    • Fagan V Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1969
    • R V R, 1991
    • The Belmarsh Case, 2004

    Over 400 years ago, the chief justice, Sir Edward Coke, ruled thatKing James I could not prohibit new building in London without the support of parliament. King James believed that he had a divine right to make any laws that he wished. But the court opposed his view, and decided that the monarchy could not wield its power in this arbitrary way. By ...

    Author and schoolmaster John Entick was suspected of writing a libellous pamphlet against the government. In response, the secretary of state sent Nathan Carrington, along with a group of other king’s men, to search Entick’s house for evidence. Entick then sued the men for trespass. The court decided thatthe secretary of state did not have the lega...

    In this case, the survivors of a shipwreck who killed and ate the youngest and weakest crew member were prosecuted for murder. Their defence was based on “necessity” – that they needed to eat the boy, as they were unlikely to survive and the boy probably would have died anyway. It may have been a “custom of the sea”that cannibalism was allowed unde...

    Mrs Carlill sued the manufacturerof the carbolic smoke ball – a device for preventing colds and flu – which had promised a reward of £100 for any one catching flu following the use of its product but then refused to pay out. The court decided that this promise, together with Mrs Carlill’s use of the product as directed, amounted to a legally bindin...

    In a case originating in Scotland, Mrs Donoghue was given a bottle of ginger beer which allegedly containedthe decomposed remains of a snail. She claimed to have suffered shock and gastroenteritis as a result. But as she had not bought the drink herself, she had no contract on which to sue. Nevertheless, the court extended the lawof negligence to r...

    To be guilty of a criminal offence, there often needs to be unlawful act accompanied by a guilty state of mind, such as a criminal intent. So, having accidentally driven his car onto a policeman’s foot, did Mr Fagan commit an assault when he decided not to remove it? Mr Fagan suggested not because he had no criminal intent at the time the car first...

    The law is constantly evolving to meet changing social attitudes. In this case, the House of Lords swept away the common law rule that a man could not be guilty of raping his wife. The previous rule was based on a 1736 pronouncement that: The House of Lords ruled thatfor modern times, marriage is a partnership of equals and any other suggestion was...

    The Human Rights Act empowered judges to review acts of parliament, to check if they are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Using this power, the House of Lords ruled thata statute which allowed terrorist suspects to be detained indefinitely without trial breached the suspects’ human rights. The caseshows how modern courts ask...

    • Nicholas Clapham
  4. Oct 3, 2024 · Early collections of case decisions were cited by the name of the clerk who reported the cases. For example, you may see Marbury v. Madison cited as 1 Cranch 137 after William Cranch, the reporter for the U.S. Supreme Court from 1801-1815.

    • Mindy Kent
    • 2011
  5. Apr 18, 2024 · For U.S. Federal and State cases, check Table 1 of the Bluebook. Try finding the case cited in a more modern source with standardized citations. Search case databases by party name instead of citation. Look for alternate spellings of the party names.

  6. People also ask

  7. Aug 29, 2019 · This book is a general history of the legal system of the United States, beginning in the colonial period, and continuing up to the present. The work was originally published in 1973; this is the fourth edition, which brings the material up to date and incorporates recent research.

  1. People also search for