Search results
the proposed ABC model of ambivalence describes the affective, cognitive, and behavioral consequences of ambivalence and specifically predicts how the different components interact with each...
This research investigated whether ambivalence-induced response amplification occurs because of a motivation to reduce ambivalence. In Study 1, participants’ ambivalence toward Native people was …
this study, we follow the prevalent psychological view that breaks down affective phenomena -- i.e. affective stimuli as well as emotional experience -- into two key dimensions: valence and arousal (Larsen and Diener, 1992; Barrett and Russel, 2009).
Jul 16, 2015 · Intercomponent ambivalence, or affective–cognitive ambivalence, refers to ambivalence as the result of conflict between cognitions and affective responses (Lavine et al., 1998; Maio et al., 2000).
For example, whereas felt ambivalence was related to less reported interest in learning issue-relevant information, a stronger false consensus effect, and less perceived hostile media bias, greater potential ambivalence was uniquely associated with increased reports of general activism.
- Mark Conner
Meta-analysis across studies supported this conclusion with both cognitive-affective inconsistency and ambivalence being significant moderators when considered on their own, but only inconsistency being significant when tested simultaneously.
People also ask
Are ambivalent attitudes affective?
What is the difference between cognitive and Affective ambivalence?
What is ambivalence in psychology?
Does ambivalence affect behavioral intentions?
What is ambivalence-induced affect?
Does ambivalence lead to negative affect?
In this chapter, we provide an overview of this research and present the ABC (Affect, Behavior, Cognition) model of ambivalence that integrates recent insights into the affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of ambivalence.