Search results
Youth diversion encompasses a variety of non-legal responses to a youth’s behavior. Implementing diversion prior to law enforcement involvement offers the greatest opportunity to utilize positive, non-punitive strategies.
The purpose of diversion programs is to redirect youthful offenders from the justice system through programming, supervision, and supports. Arguments that support diversion programs include the following: Diverting youth who have committed minor offenses away from the system and towards community-based treatment involving the youth's family and ...
In line with current research and best practices, diversion should be implemented at the earliest point possible to minimize contact with the juvenile delinquency system.
California are affecting a system that criminalizes youth and sets them up for a cycle of justice involvement. PYJI partners are paving the way for an equitable future where youth are not enmeshed in the school-to-prison pipeline; instead, they are gaining tools and training to prevent and dismantle it.
Mar 31, 2022 · The National Center for Youth Law, through collaborations with lawmakers and community groups, was instrumental in California committing nearly $60 million to programs that divert youth away from jails and assist them toward healthy and appropriate supports.
California law defines diversion as “a program that promotes positive youth development by relying on responses that prevent a young person’s involvement or further involvement in the justice system.”1 Diversion programming may include a range of responses, from a simple “warning and release”
People also ask
What arguments support diversion programs?
What is a diversion program?
Are parents affected by juvenile diversion?
Can diversion programs reduce recidivism?
What are the benefits of a diversion program?
Can juvenile justice professionals implement a pre-adjudication diversion program?
May 12, 2021 · The themes discussed include how diversion programs shape parent–child bonds, how parents navigate negative indictments of youth and themselves for participating in diversion, and the influence of external challenges and social forces shaping youth and parent experiences.
