Search results
2 days ago · What does Kane mean by "plural voluntary control"? How does it relate to self-forming actions? If Kane is correct, are humans free in such a way that we can be held morally responsible for our actions? Why or why not?
Study with Quizlet and memorise flashcards containing terms like Definition of luck (2 part), Ultimate Responsibility conclusion, Two indeterministic universes case (Van Inwagen) and others.
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like ultimate responsibility, What do you need to have ultimate responsibility?, The causal origins of character and more.
Aug 17, 2000 · Kane (e.g., at 2007b: 174–75) makes a similar appeal to the build-up of responsibility stemming from slight responsibility for one’s earliest free choices. Centered accounts also face the problem of enhanced control.
- Randolph Clarke, Justin Capes
- 2000
It is important to note that the crux of Kane's position is grounded not in a defense of alternative possibilities (AP) but in the notion of what Kane refers to as ultimate responsibility (UR). Thus, AP is a necessary but insufficient criterion for free will.
Kane points out that there is another necessary condition for moral responsibility, and thus a different reason to worry about the relationship between causal determinism and moral responsibility. This second condition is the condition of "ultimate responsibility." It seeks to capture the strong
People also ask
What does Kane say about free action?
What does Kane call regress-stopping actions?
How does Kane explain (R)?
Who is Robert Kane?
Ultimate Responsibility (UR) is Robert Kane's concept that we can be responsible for current actions, ones that are essentially determined (this can only be adequate determinism, of course) by our character and values, as long as we formed that character ourselves by earlier free actions that he calls Self-Forming Actions.
