Search results
- Ultimate Responsibility (UR) is Robert Kane 's concept that we can be responsible for current actions, ones that are essentially determined (this can only be adequate determinism, of course) by our character and values, as long as we formed that character ourselves by earlier free actions that he calls Self-Forming Actions.
www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/ultimate_responsibility.html
People also ask
What does Kane mean by 'ultimate responsibility'?
What does Kane say about free action?
Who is Robert Kane?
What is Kane's model of moral responsibility?
Ultimate Responsibility (UR) is Robert Kane's concept that we can be responsible for current actions, ones that are essentially determined (this can only be adequate determinism, of course) by our character and values, as long as we formed that character ourselves by earlier free actions that he calls Self-Forming Actions.
- Libet Experiments
The neurologist Benjamin Libet performed a sequence of...
- The History
Put a bit more carefully, they tend to begin with the notion...
- Moral Necessity
Moral necessity describes the will being (self) determined...
- Responsibility
The will is in part a psychological question. responsibility...
- Origination
Origination is the idea that new causal chains can begin...
- Possibilism
Possibilism finds support in the fact that quantum physics...
- Reason
Reason is almost as vague a term as its Greek cognate...
- Mysteries
Until recently, no thinker has succeeded in getting past the...
- Libet Experiments
By ultimate responsibility Kane means that the sources or origins of our actions lie "in us" rather than in something else (such as decrees of fate, foreordained acts of God, or antecedent causes and laws of nature) which are outside us and beyond our control.
Ultimate responsibility entails that agents must be the ultimate creators (or originators) and sustainers of their own ends and purposes. There must be more than one way for a person's life to turn out (AP). More importantly, whichever way it turns out must be based in the person's willing actions. As Kane defines it,
This chapter turns to the second and the more important criterion for free will, namely, ultimate responsibility. A series of theses are defended that explain what this criterion entails and why it is incompatible with determinism.
Aug 17, 2000 · Kane (e.g., at 2007b: 174–75) makes a similar appeal to the build-up of responsibility stemming from slight responsibility for one’s earliest free choices. Centered accounts also face the problem of enhanced control.
- Randolph Clarke, Justin Capes
- 2000
Kane’s model for free will is designed to provide an agent with what he calls Ultimate Responsibility (UR), based on his idea of the Self-Forming Action. Kane’s importance in the history of the free will problem is fourfold. First, his event-causal free will model has in recent years been the libertarian model most often discussed, and the
nwagen and other incompatibilists claim. The Consequence Argument would show that determinism conflicts with anyone’s power to do oth. rw. se and thus conflicts with free will.3. An Objec. ion Concerning “Can” and “Power”The Consequence Argument is a powerful argument for the incompatibil-ity of free will and det.
