Search results
There are three broad ways to effectively reduce s-risk: Attempting to shape the development of pivotal new technologies by implementing precautionary measures against s-risks.
by Tobias Baumann. First published in 2021. Avoiding futures with astronomical amounts of suffering (s-risks) is a plausible priority from the perspective of many value systems, particularly for suffering-focused views.
Which types of s-risk are most important in terms of the amount of expected suffering? Which types of s-risk are particularly tractable or neglected? What are the most significant risk factors that make different types of s-risks more likely, or more serious in scale if they occur?
Dec 5, 2023 · In his new book, Avoiding the Worst: How to Prevent a Moral Catastrophe, Tobias lays out the concept of risks of future suffering (s-risks) and outlines ways to steer the world away from s-risks and towards a brighter future.
In Avoiding the Worst, Tobias Baumann lays out the concept of risks of future suffering (s-risks). With a focus on s-risks that are both realistic and avoidable, he argues that we have strong reasons to consider their reduction a top priority.
Sep 5, 2023 · S-risks might result from unintended consequences of pursuing large-scale goals (“incidental s-risks”), intentional harm by intelligent beings with influence over many resources (agential), or processes that occur without agents’ intervention (natural) (Baumann 2018a).
People also ask
Should s-risks be a top priority among altruistic causes?
Should we reject (B)?
What is a good measure of the seriousness of risks?
Are s-risks improbable?
What is a necessary condition for a s-risk to occur?
Should we avert s-risks?
Oct 28, 2022 · In Avoiding the Worst, Tobias Baumann lays out the concept of risks of future suffering (s-risks). With a focus on s-risks that are both realistic and avoidable, he argues that we have strong reasons to consider their reduction a top priority.
