Search results
- Certain statutory and common law offences allow the prosecution to prove the mens rea on the basis of ‘recklessness’. In essence, recklessness means the taking of an unjustified risk by the accused that leads to unlawful harm or damage.
www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/recklessness-in-criminal-casesRecklessness in criminal cases | Legal Guidance - LexisNexis
People also ask
What does recklessness mean in criminal law?
What does'recklessness' mean in a criminal case?
Is recklessness unjustified risk taking?
What is recklessness under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 S1?
What is the subjective test for recklessness?
What is recklessness V Cunningham?
An outline of the law on recklessness and its role in establishing criminal liability. Contains a consideration of the key cases of MPC v Caldwell, R v Cunningham and R v G & R with a consideration of the impact and problems with each type of recklessness.
- Key Point
- Facts
- Held
- Lord Bingham
The objective test for recklessness (known as Caldwellrecklessness) was rejected in favour of a subjective test
Two boys (Ds) set fire to newspapers in the back of a shophouse, and burnt down supermarket and adjoining buildingsThey were charged under s1 Criminal Damage act 1971 for reckless arsonDs were not guilty of arson as they had not been reckless; they had been unable to appreciate the risk due to their immaturity
Overruling R v Caldwell
1. ‘The present case shows, more clearly than any other reported case since R v Caldwell, that the model direction formulated by Lord Diplock (see paragraph 18 above) is capable of leading to obvious unfairness’ 2. ‘It is neither moral nor just to convict a defendant (least of all a child) on the strength of what someone else would have apprehended if the defendant himself had no such apprehension.’: 3. R v Caldwell was a misinterpretation of s1 Criminal Damage Act 1971 that offended principle:
Subjective test for recklessness
1. “A person acts recklessly within the meaning of section 1 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 with respect to—(i) a circumstance when he is aware of a risk that it exists or will exist; (ii) a result when he is aware of a risk that it will occur; and it is, in the circumstances known to him, unreasonable to take the risk.”:
Following the case of R v G, the court have applied the definition of recklessness to several cases in relation to voluntary intoxication where the defendant’s foresight of the risk at the time of intoxication is not investigated.
“A person acts … ‘recklessly’ within the meaning of s 1 of the 1971 Act with respect to – (i) a circumstance when he is aware of a risk that it exists or will exist; (i i) a result when he is aware
- 16KB
- 2
In essence, recklessness means the taking of an unjustified risk by the accused that leads to unlawful harm or damage.The subjective test for recklessness was reaffirmed by the House of Lords in R v G.
Oct 20, 2024 · Recklessness refers to a mental state in which a person disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk, resulting in harm or potential harm to others. In criminal law, it signifies the awareness and conscious disregard of a known risk, but it stops short of intentional harm.
