Search results
The crude characterization of Strauss as a “consequentialist” does not much help matters either. A more subtle discussion of Strauss's “exotericism” and his relation to Nietzsche can be found in Stanley Rosen, Hermeneutics as Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), 107-23.
- ROBERT B. PIPPIN
Strauss defends the idea of a living Constitution while Scalia famously said he prefers the dead one. Accordingly, Strauss takes originalism to be the primary alternative to his common law method of interpreting the Constitution.
The “Straussian” approach to the history of political philosophy is articulated primarily in the writings of Leo Strauss. Strauss wrote extremely careful, detailed studies of canonical philosophical works along with essays explaining his approach.
In the essay, Persecution and the Art of Writing, Strauss posits that information needs to be kept secret from the masses by "writing between the lines". However, this seems like a false premise, as most authors Strauss refers to in his work lived in times when only the social elites were literate enough to understand works of philosophy.
Dec 1, 2010 · Leo Strauss was a twentieth-century German Jewish émigré to the United States whose intellectual corpus spans ancient, medieval and modern political philosophy and includes, among others, studies of Plato, Maimonides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Spinoza, and Nietzsche. Strauss wrote mainly as a historian of philosophy and most of his writings take ...
Jul 18, 2014 · Sharing the ancient understanding of the tension between politics and philosophy, Strauss consistently maintained that philosophers do not want to rule, but they do employ certain forms of rhetoric to encourage their readers, especially their young readers, to seek the truth for themselves.
People also ask
Why did Strauss study philosophy?
Who wrote the Straussian approach to political philosophy?
Was Strauss a philosopher?
What does Strauss say about politics?
What happened to Strauss's natural right & history?
Who was Leo Strauss?
J\t the time Strauss published Natural Right and History (1953) the state of the question of natural right was a mixture of oblivion and. fitful restoration. Natural right had disappeared from the center of discussion in political philosophy for well over a century.
