Search results
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TATANA SPICAKOVA ROMERO et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v. LI-CHUAN SHIH et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Cross-defendant and Respondent.
Romero v. Shih, EC064933, Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County. Judgment entered October 26, 2020.
Feb 1, 2024 · Petitions for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment in a civil action. This case presents the following issue: Did the trial court correctly find the existence of an implied easement under the facts?
CESAR ROMERO and TATANA SPICAKOVA ROMERO, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LI-CHUAN SHIH and TUN-JEN KO, Defendants and Respondents. REVIEW OF A PUBLISHED DECISION BY THE COURT OF APP. AL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, CASE NO. REPLY TO ANSWER TO PETITION FOR REVIEW.
Cesar Romero, et al., Petitioners. v. Li-Chuan Shih, et al. Docketed: April 23, 2024. Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California. Case Numbers:
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA . CESAR ROMERO and TATANA SPICAKOVA ROMERO, Plaintiffs and Appellants. v. LI-CHUAN SHIH and TUN-JEN KO, Defendants and Respondents. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Cross-defendant and Respondent. AFTER A PUBLISHED DECISION BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGH T CASE NO. B310069
CESAR ROMERO and TATANA SPICAKOVA ROMERO, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LI-CHUAN SHIH and TUN-JEN KO, Defendants and Respondents. REVIEW OF A PUBLISHED DECISION BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, CASE NO. B310069 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. EC064933, THE HONORABLE CURTIS A. KIN PRESIDING JUDGE.
