Compare 1000s of Items and Find the Best Deals on Womens Golf Clubs Today. Find the Best Deals on Womens Golf Clubs Today
Search results
The Women's Club. A businesswoman (Maud Adams) promotes a struggling Hollywood screenwriter (Michael Paré) as a lover for hire. Content collapsed. I liked Pare and Velez, they were fun characters ...
- Movie Reviews
Smile 2 Reviews. Halloween Programming Guide. The Women's...
- Movie Reviews
Patrick is a struggling screenwriter who takes a second job as a male prostitute. He is supposed to write by day and do right by his lonely clientele at night, but he develops writer’s block. When Patrick decides to draw from his amorous experiences as inspiration for his next screenplay, the women conspire to prevent it.
- Sandra Weintraub
The Women's Club Reviews. 1987. 1 hr 29 mins. Comedy. R. Watchlist. Where to Watch. Michael Pare as a struggling writer who moonlights as a gigolo for bored ladies. Angie: Maud Adams.
NR 1 hr 26 min Jan 2nd, 1987 Comedy. Patrick is a struggling screenwriter who takes a second job as a male prostitute. He is supposed to write by day and do right by his lonely clientele at night ...
- Sandra Weintraub
- Michael Paré
The Women's Club is a film directed by Sandra Weintraub Roland with Michael Paré, Maud Adams, Eddie Velez, Dotty Coloroso .... Year: 1987. Original title: The Women's Club. Synopsis: Patrick is a struggling screenwriter who takes a second job as a male prostitute. He is supposed to write by day and do right by his lonely clientele at night ...
- Kent L. Wakeford
- Sandra Weintraub Roland
- United States
- Comedy
The Women's Club 1987. The Women's Club. Patrick is a struggling screenwriter who takes a second job as a male prostitute. He is supposed to write by day and do right by his lonely clientele at ...
People also ask
Who directed the women's club?
What year was the women's club written?
Is the women's club copyrighted?
Smile 2 Reviews. Halloween Programming Guide. The Women's Club. R , 1h 29m. Comedy,Drama. Directed By: Sandra Weintraub. Do you think we mischaracterized a critic's review?