Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Oct 3, 2022 · Updated on October 3, 2022 Sentences. The correct choice between was and were in an if clause depends on whether you’re using an unreal conditional sentence, also known as a hypothetical sentence. But how do you know if you’re dealing with an unreal conditional sentence?

  2. Oct 27, 2007 · In general, you use the indicative (is, was, am) if and only if you are indicating that a statement or hypothesis is true, and the subjunctive if you are not making a judgement about a statements truth value, or - by not indicating that it is true - implying that it is not true.

  3. 1 Answer. Sorted by: -1. "If it was not for", indicative, implies a certitude. "Napoléon was certain to win at Waterloo, if it wasn't not for unexpected heavy rains and his canons stuck in the mud". "If it were not for", subjunctive, express a doubt.

  4. May 8, 2023 · Chances are, you’re familiar with one difference between was and were: the fact that was is the first- and third-person singular past tense form of the verb to be, while were is the second-person singular past and the plural past form of to be.

  5. Jan 19, 2020 · Whenever we’re talking about something that isn’t a reality at the moment, we discard “was” and choose “were” instead. It doesn’t matter whether we are referring to a single person or a group of people. As soon as we cross the border between reality and speculation, “were” is the only word to choose.

  6. Mar 28, 2024 · Understanding the subject-verb agreement rules and distinguishing between singular and plural usage of “wasn’t” and “werent” significantly enhances your overall grammar skills, enabling you to communicate more effectively and confidently in English.

  7. People also ask

  8. A clause introduced by if may express a simple condition relating to the past and take the indicative form of the verb. For example, in "If Allan was there, he was drunk," the if clause introduces a supposition, hence a verb in the indicative mood.

  1. People also search for