Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Oct 3, 2022 · The question of whether to use will or would in an if clause is another confusing topic, but the short answer is that will is better for real conditional sentences (especially paired with when) and would or could are better for unreal conditional sentences.

  2. In your specific case, neither 'was' nor 'were' is best; you should say "if it is running". "If it were running" is subjunctive case, used to describe hypothetical situations: "If it were running, I would stop it first, but it's already stopped."

  3. Shower for cleaning and bath for relaxing. This is the exact right answer. The Japanese generally run a bath and the same water is used for the entire family one after the other. For them, they have a separate shower, and one needs to be totally clean and without soap in order to enter the bath.

  4. Were and weren't are correct (and the subjunctive mood is weird). When you express a wish, the past subjunctive is the correct tense and mood. [Link added -- I did say the subjunctive is weird.]

  5. May 8, 2023 · Chances are, you’re familiar with one difference between was and were: the fact that was is the first- and third-person singular past tense form of the verb to be, while were is the second-person singular past and the plural past form of to be. But what about when you’re talking about hypotheticals—for instance, in a sentence like “If I ...

  6. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a typical shower uses 20 gallons of water compared to 70 gallons for a bath. The EPA has been encouraging children to shower rather than take baths as a way of conserving water, an increasingly limited resource.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jun 9, 2021 · The short answer is, yes, in terms of your health and well-being a bath is better than a shower. Showers may be better at cleaning you than a bath can be, but that does not mean that a beautiful bath time isn’t good for you too.

  1. People also search for