Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. lawreview.syr.edu › the-defamed-explained-depp-v-heardThe Defamed Explained: Depp v. Heard - Syracuse Law Review

   lawreview.syr.edu › the-defamed-explained-depp-v-heard

   • Cached

   Jun 9, 2022 · The testimony ended on May 27th and the jury began deliberation. On June 1st, the jury reached a unanimous verdict that Heard defamed Depp and awarded him $5 million in punitive damage (money awarded to punish) and $10 million in compensatory damages (money awarded to compensate for loss or injury).

2. www.essex.ac.uk › blog › postsThe Johnny Depp libel trial explained - University of Essex

   www.essex.ac.uk › blog › posts

   • Cached

   Nov 5, 2020 · On November 2 2020, London’s High Court handed down its hotly anticipated judgment in the high-profile libel case brought by Hollywood actor Johnny Depp over a newspaper article which labelled him a “wife-beater”.

3. theconversation.com › the-johnny-depp-libel-trialThe Johnny Depp libel trial explained - The Conversation

   theconversation.com › the-johnny-depp-libel-trial

   • Cached

   Nov 3, 2020 · In his 585-paragraph ruling the presiding judge, Mr Justice Nicol, dismissed the actor’s claim, holding in essence that the words used in The Sun’s report were legally acceptable.

   • Author: Alexandros Antoniou

4. www.simmons-simmons.com › en › publicationsJohnny Depp v NGN: truth as the greatest defence

   www.simmons-simmons.com › en › publications

   • Cached

   • Background
   • The Court’S Decision
   • Comment

   The article in question was published on The Sun website on 27 April 2018, originally with the headline “GONE POTTY, how can JK Rowling be “genuinely happy” casting wifebeater Johnny Depp in the new Fantastic Beasts film?”. The term “wife-beater” was later replaced by “allegations of assault”. Although the accompanying article was primarily intende...

   See full list on simmons-simmons.com

   It was accepted by counsel for NGN that publication of the article had caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to Mr Depp’s reputation. The primary issues before the Court at trial were therefore: 1. the meaning that should be attributed to the statements made in the article; and 2. whether those statements were “substantially true” such that ...

   See full list on simmons-simmons.com

   This hearing is unlikely to be the end of this matter. Mr Depp’s lawyers have described Nicol J’s judgement as “perverse and bewildering” and confirmed their intention to appeal. We also expect that this ruling will have some impact on Mr Depp’s US libel case against Ms Heard, relating to her opinion piece in the Washington Post detailing similar a...

   See full list on simmons-simmons.com

5. www.bbc.com › news › world-us-canada-61679714Depp v Heard: The in-depth story of the trial - BBC

   www.bbc.com › news › world-us-canada-61679714

   • Cached

   Jun 3, 2022 · The six-week defamation case between actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard attracted global attention. BBC News looks at the key moments from the high-profile trial of the former lovers.

6. www.binnall.com › insights-news › unveiling-theUnveiling the Truth: How the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial ...

   www.binnall.com › insights-news › unveiling-the

   • Cached

   Jun 9, 2022 · The riveting trial of Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard has come to an end with the Pirates of the Caribbean star victorious to a tune of $15 million. As most anyone with a social media account likely knows, Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for defamation in Virginia’s Fairfax County Circuit Court.

7. www.bbc.co.uk › news › entertainment-arts-54506759Inside the Johnny Depp court case - BBC News

   www.bbc.co.uk › news › entertainment-arts-54506759

   • Cached

   Nov 2, 2020 · When Johnny Depp described her accusations as a hoax, he was not just challenging her story, he was ripping away the foundations of her public profile. There was a lot at stake here.