Search results
THE APOLOGY: THE BEGINNING OF PLATO'S OWN PHILOSOPHY. 1. Preliminary remarks. It has often been assumed that Plato's Apology is a faithful speech on the final day of his trial in 399 B.C.; that it contains Plato's own philosophy; and that it therefore represents rather. historical Socrates on how to live and how to philosophize. In this belief,
The Apology. by Plato. I do not know, men of Athens, how my 17 accusers affected you; as for me, I was almost carried away in spite of myself, so persuasively did they speak. And yet, hardly anything of what they said is true.
- 429KB
- 15
“The Apology” is Plato’s account of the three speeches that Socrates gave at his trial for false teaching and heresy in 399 B.C.E. At the age of 71, Socrates fought at his trial not for his life, but for the truth.
Nov 20, 2020 · Notable features of the psychological literature on apology are the lack of a comprehensive theory of apology, the failure of authors to explicitly define the word and the absence of a generally accepted definition of apology among those who do provide a definition.
- Debra J Slocum, Alfred Allan, Maria M Allan
- 2011
Thus the Apology is in three parts. The first and major part is the main speech (17a–35d), followed by the counter-assessment (35e–38b), 1. The word apology is a transliteration, not a translation, of the Greek apologia, which means defense. There is certainly nothing apologetic about the speech.
Plato: The Apology of Socrates, the Crito, and part of the Phaedo : with notes from Stallbaum, Schleiermacher's introductions, A life of Socrates, and Schleiermacher's Essay on the worth of Socrates as a philosopher. (T.
People also ask
What are the three parts of the apology?
What is an apology in psychology?
What was Graham Greene's 'apology'?
When was apology first used?
Does an apology have a fixed content?
What role does apology play in the forgiving process?
This 'apology', written in 1940 as his mathematical powers were declining, offers a brilliant and engaging account of mathematics as very much more than a science; when it was first published, Graham Greene hailed it alongside Henry James's notebooks as 'the best account of what it was like to be a creative artist'.
