Search results
Brief Fact Summary. For thirty years, a maker of confections conducted business in a property that use two large mortars that made a substantial amount of noise when operating. A physician, who previously had a garden in the area directly behind the mortar, decided to convert the garden into a consultation room.
- Hunt V. State
Citation69 A.3d 360 (Del. 2013) Brief Fact Summary....
- Stockett V. Tolin
Citation791 F. Supp. 1536 (S. D. Fla. 1992) Brief Fact...
- Hunt V. State
Jan 8, 2024 · Discover real-world case studies of Data-Driven Decision-Making (DDDM) and how companies like Netflix, Amazon, and Starbucks leveraged data for success. These five examples will help guide you in the right direction by using Data-Driven Decision-Making Case Studies.
- Facts
- Issues
- Decision/Outcome
The claimant, a doctor, moved house and on the premises, he bought and built a shed in his garden to carry out his private practice within. His shed was on the boundary of the property and happened to be next door to a confectioner. The confectioner had produced sweets in his kitchen for many years before the doctor had moved in. The doctor alleged...
Whether the doctor could claim loss of amenity when he had ‘moved to the nuisance’ or not. Whether the character of the area or locality as a residential area meant that there was a nuisance.
There was a nuisance, and the fact that the doctor had ‘moved to the nuisance’ was no defence to the nuisance itself. Nor was there an easement acquired by the confectioner through long usage that entitled him to continue with his actions. What constitutes a nuisance was to be decided on a case to case basis, and it is necessary to consider the par...
Jan 1, 2011 · To what extent do racial, gendered, and race/gendered identities affect the legislation decision process? To test this proposition, I examine how race and gender based identities shape the legislative decisions of Black women in comparison to White men, White women, and Black men.
- Nadia Brown
- 2011
May 15, 2020 · Structured decision-making is a type of decision analysis that emphasizes a collaborative approach to 1) defining the problem, 2) identifying objectives, 3) creating alternatives, 4)...
Decision. The Court of Appeal held in favour of the claimant. The defendant’s activities were a nuisance. He had not acquired a prescriptive easement to cause a nuisance because his activities only became a nuisance after the claimant built the consulting room. This was too recent for prescription.
Oct 24, 2019 · Craig had held that state treasury notes could not be legal tender, and Sturges dealt with the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws. No one could or did argue that those cases were controlling precedents on the legal tender question.
