Background Check, Traffic, Police, Criminal & Court Records, Contact Info and Much More! Anonymous Searching - See Anyone's Court Records. Enter a Name & Search Instantly.
Search results
Brief Fact Summary. For thirty years, a maker of confections conducted business in a property that use two large mortars that made a substantial amount of noise when operating. A physician, who previously had a garden in the area directly behind the mortar, decided to convert the garden into a consultation room.
- Hunt V. State
Citation69 A.3d 360 (Del. 2013) Brief Fact Summary....
- Stockett V. Tolin
Citation791 F. Supp. 1536 (S. D. Fla. 1992) Brief Fact...
- Hunt V. State
- Facts
- Issues
- Decision/Outcome
The claimant, a doctor, moved house and on the premises, he bought and built a shed in his garden to carry out his private practice within. His shed was on the boundary of the property and happened to be next door to a confectioner. The confectioner had produced sweets in his kitchen for many years before the doctor had moved in. The doctor alleged...
Whether the doctor could claim loss of amenity when he had ‘moved to the nuisance’ or not. Whether the character of the area or locality as a residential area meant that there was a nuisance.
There was a nuisance, and the fact that the doctor had ‘moved to the nuisance’ was no defence to the nuisance itself. Nor was there an easement acquired by the confectioner through long usage that entitled him to continue with his actions. What constitutes a nuisance was to be decided on a case to case basis, and it is necessary to consider the par...
Search for Supreme Court of Ohio Cases. Entering a complete case number will open the docket view for that case when you click search.
Jan 22, 2024 · This legal document is a complaint filed by Plaintiffs against Defendants alleging fraudulent concealment and misrepresentations. The Plaintiffs claim they made payments to purchase shares in All Elements Fund I (AEFI) and that these transactions were fraudulent.
Terry v. Ohio: Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may ...
Sturges v Bridgman – Case Summary – IPSA LOQUITUR. Court of Appeal. Citations: (1879) 11 Ch D 852; (1879) 43 JP 716; (1879) 48 LJ Ch 785; (1879) 41 LT 219. Facts. The defendant was a confectioner whose premises neighboured the claimant’s home. The defendant used a noisy pestle and mortar from around 10am to around 1pm each day.
People also ask
What happened in Sturges v Bridgman?
Where can I find Ohio caselaw summaries?
When did the Supreme Court of Ohio file a case?
What happened in Disciplinary Counsel V Brueggeman?
In Case You Missed It – The following are summaries of cases decided by Ohio courts between November 16, 2020 – January 31, 2021. To read the decisions in their entirety, please visit ebar.ohiobar.org and enter the case name in the “keyword” search field.
