Search results
1. This appeal is concerned with the Secretary of State’s policy that certain people claiming asylum in the United Kingdom should not have their claims considered here, but should instead be sent to Rwanda in order to claim asylum there.
Nov 15, 2023 · The Supreme Court upheld a Court of Appeal ruling, which said the policy leaves people sent to Rwanda open to human rights breaches. It means the policy cannot be implemented in its current...
- 46 sec
- Dominic Casciani and Sean Seddon
Nov 15, 2023 · In a landmark and unanimous judgment, the Supreme Court has upheld the earlier Court of Appeal ruling in AAA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 745 that the Government’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda is unlawful.
Nov 15, 2023 · The decision is a surprise in one way: the Supreme Court under Reed (who succeeded Baroness Hale as president) is considered by many commentators as being deferential on “policy” matters.
- David Allen Green
Nov 15, 2023 · The UK supreme court has unanimously ruled that the government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful. Upholding an earlier decision by the court of appeal, the supreme court found...
- Devyani Prabhat
Nov 15, 2023 · The Supreme Court upheld a Court of Appeal ruling, which said the policy leaves people sent to Rwanda open to human rights breaches. It means the policy cannot be implemented in its...
Nov 16, 2023 · Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has vowed to push ahead with his flagship immigration policy, known as the Rwanda plan, despite the highest court in the land finding it to be unlawful. But what is the scheme? Why is it so controversial? And how did it end up in the judicial system?
People also ask
What did the Supreme Court say about Rwanda?
Is the ECHR a practical obstacle to the Rwanda policy?
Is Rwanda's removal policy illegal?
Did ministers ignore evidence that Rwanda's asylum system was unfair?
