9.0/10 (270 reviews)
Your Donation Helps Childrens in Need Access Education and Care. Give Children a Chance to Overcome Challenges, Donate Now
Search results
Our oversight of national and local reviews gives us a unique insight into patterns of practice in child safeguarding, illuminated by the Panel’s national reviews and wider analysis of local...
- 907KB
- 52
Read a summary of the key characteristics and learning from serious incidents, rapid reviews, local child safeguarding practice reviews and case reviews in 2020.
A list of the child safeguarding practice reviews, serious case reviews, significant case reviews and child practice reviews added to the national case review repository from the last five years.
- 1.1 Working Together to Safeguard Children 2018 contains the statutory guidance for undertaking Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews (CSPRs) when a serious child safeguarding cases has been reported. These are cases in which:
- 6.1.6 Further home visits took place on 13th December 2016, by health visitor A, and 4th April 2017, by community nursery nurse A. Both parents were present. In respect of the first visit, whilst it is highlighted that there was good delivery of the SOP, particularly in relation to safe sleeping and smoking, there was no follow up of the referral to the Children’s Centre, or discussion around the family finances, apart from a reference to food banks. There is still a reference to clutter.
- 7. Conclusions
- 8.1 Recommendations – Single Agency
- 8.2 Recommendations – Multi Agency
abuse or neglect of a child is known or suspected and the child has died or been seriously harmed 1.2 Meeting the criteria does not mean that safeguarding partners must automatically carry out a local child safeguarding practice review. It is for them to determine whether a review is appropriate, taking into account that the overall purpose of a re...
Whilst it appears that the family were coping, the impression is that they would have benefitted from further support, and the offer of Early Help should have been made. A MARF should have been submitted, In respect of the second visit, the focus is primarily on the development of Emily, which was positive. However, two dietician appointments had b...
7.1 Considering the information used to undertake this review, it would appear that there had been very little multi-agency involvement with the family and that it was predominantly the midwifery and health visiting services which had had any recent contact with them. Despite concerns raised regarding home conditions in the antenatal and postnatal ...
Each agency has identified single agency recommendations following completion of single agency incident management reports.
The Dudley Safeguarding People Partnership (DSPP) should ensure the GCP2 tool is utilised in every case where concerns are raised regarding home conditions and potential neglect. It should also ensure that the CIRC is utilised where clutter is identified as a factor. Cases should be audited to ensure compliance. The DSPP should review multi-agenc...
Nearly half of SCRs involving children over the age of 6 included mental health problems for the child. In almost three out of every 10 cases, bullying was found to be a factor as an adverse experience of the child.
6 days ago · We look at the quality of care in Scotland to ensure it meets high standards. When improvement is needed, we support services to make positive changes.
This article provides an overview of the new multi-agency arrangements and summarizes key learning points from the final analysis of Serious Case Reviews between 2017 and 2019 and the annual review of Local Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews from 2021.
Most Useful Ranking List of Early childhood education. Confused by choices? Find reviews and anwsers on infomation-hub.com.
