Search results
Aims. The present study aims to assess the extent to which attention to UK cigarette warnings is attributable to the graphic nature of the content. Design.
- Kyle G. Brown, John G. Reidy, Anna R. Weighall, Madelynne A. Arden
- 2013
It is designed to help localities to embed their communications activity in a broader approach to tobacco control designed to drive down smoking prevalence, with case studies to provide examples of good practice at local and regional level. Introduction.
Oct 16, 2012 · This mixed design yielded image content (graphic versus neutrally-matched images) and presence (versus absence) of text caption as within subjects variables and smoking status as a between-participants variable.
Apr 27, 2022 · In other words, the health warning label is an effective communication channel that is widely and easily accessed by smokers. 5 Specifically, using warning graphic images together with warning statements presenting potential health impacts was shown to be more effective than using images or statements separately. 6 - 9.
Two-thirds of adolescent and young adult smokers become lifetime smokers, and one-half of those lifetime smokers will die from this habit. The authors examine alternative persuasive pathways to thoughts of quitting taken by adolescent and young adult smokers when exposed to graphic visual health warnings on cigarette packages. For adolescent
Jun 15, 2012 · Images of patients on ventilators on cigarette packets help smokers heed the health warnings about smoking better than written warnings, says US research.
People also ask
Do images on cigarette packets help smokers heed health warnings?
Can warning graphic images help prevent smoking?
Do smoking warning images contribute to late-teenagers' fear of smoking-related harms?
Should smoking warning images be used to promote smoking cessation?
Should smoking warning images be used on cigarette packs?
Do graphic warning labels increase risk perceptions and smoking myth endorsement?
Each participant viewed 27 labels (18 of the proposed labels with graphic images and text warnings and 9 with text-only warnings) in a random order, evaluating each label on understandability and its effects on fear-related reactions and discouragement from wanting to smoke. Results. Respondents found most of the proposed labels easy to understand.
