Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 23, 2015 · In 1935, Henry J. Richardson, Jr., an Indianapolis attorney and state legislator, became the target of threats from the Ku Klux Klan after introducing a civil rights bill providing for equal rights to public accommodations in Indiana.

    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • robert richardson attorney indianapolis1
    • robert richardson attorney indianapolis2
    • robert richardson attorney indianapolis3
    • robert richardson attorney indianapolis4
    • robert richardson attorney indianapolis5
  2. 4 On July 11, 2007, the State charged Richardson with Class A felony dealing in cocaine, Class C felony possession of cocaine, Class C felony possession of cocaine and a firearm, Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, and Class A misdemeanor battery on a law enforcement officer.

  3. Defendant Robert Richardson was stopped for driving his pickup truck without wearing a seatbelt. The police officer s subsequent inquiry regarding a large, unusual bulge in his pocket led to the discovery of cocaine.

  4. Justia › US Law › Case Law › Indiana Case Law › Indiana Court of Appeals Decisions › 2011 › Robert M. Richardson v. State of Indiana (NFP) Robert M ...

    • The Double Jeopardy Clause of The Indiana Constitution
    • Statutory Elements Test: Could Separate Offenses Be established?
    • Actual Evidence Test: Were Separate Offenses Established at Trial?
    • Conclusion

    Questions arising under the Indiana Constitution are to be resolved by "examining the language of the text in the context of the history surrounding its drafting and ratification, the purpose and structure of our constitution, and case law interpreting the specific provisions." Indiana Gaming Comm'n v. Moseley, 643 N.E.2d 296, 298 (Ind. 1994). In c...

    The objective of this test is to determine whether the essential elements of separate statutory crimes charged could be established hypothetically. In this test, the charged offenses are identified by comparing the essential statutory elements of one charged offense with the essential statutory elements of the other charged offense. Inspecting the ...

    As previously noted, the examination of the evidence presented at trial was an integral component of the double jeopardy analysis employed in those decisions of this Court immediately following the adoption of our Double Jeopardy Clause. We preserve this component, the actual evidence test, as a separate consideration to be used in analyzing the "s...

    Because the defendant's convictions for both robbery and battery as a class A misdemeanor, under the circumstances presented, violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Indiana Constitution, we vacate the conviction and sentence for battery as a class A misdemeanor. This cause is remanded to the trial court for disposition consistent with this opini...

  5. Oct 1, 1999 · The defendant-appellant, Robert Richardson, II, was convicted of robbery as a class C felony 1 and battery as a class A misdemeanor. 2 The defendant was sentenced to eight years imprisonment for the robbery and one year for the battery.

  6. · Experience: Miranda Rose Richard, Attorney at Law · Education: Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law · Location: Indianapolis · 416 connections on LinkedIn.

    • Miranda Rose Richard, Attorney at Law
  1. People also search for