Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.pardoes.co.uk › blog › the-imerman-rule-and-selfFamily law Family blog the imerman rule - Pardoes

   www.pardoes.co.uk › blog › the-imerman-rule-and-self

   • Cached

   Jan 17, 2024 · The Imerman Rule and self help in financial proceedings. This blog explains the various rules governing financial disclosure and how the decision in Imerman v Tchenguiz contradicts the decision of Hildebrand v Hildebrand.

2. www.lawsociety.org.uk › topics › family-and-childrenImerman: disclosure and self-help in ... - The Law Society

   www.lawsociety.org.uk › topics › family-and-children

   • Cached

   • Hildebrand V Hildebrand
   • Imerman
   • The Imerman Judgment
   • What Happened Next?
   • Using Imerman Documents
   • What This Means For Solicitors

   In Hildebrand v Hildebrand[1992] 1 FLR 244, the husband obtained and copied documents kept in his wife’s private files. He requested information from the wife during the financial proceedings that he already had from the documents he had taken. The court refused to order the wife to provide the information, on the grounds that the making of such an...

   See full list on lawsociety.org.uk

   Mrs Imerman’s brother was concerned that Mr Imerman would conceal assets once she started divorce proceedings. He shared an office and computer system with the husband, so accessed Mr Imerman’s computer and downloaded somewhere between 250,000 and 2.5 million pages. Some of this material was handed to the wife’s solicitors, who disclosed it to the ...

   See full list on lawsociety.org.uk

   The Court of Appeal distilled the following principles as applying to self-help in financial remedy proceedings: 1. A spouse’s duty to make disclosure of their financial circumstances only arose at the point when the rules required Form E to be filed 2. The so-called Hildebrand rule in reality was no more than an obligation to make prompt disclosur...

   See full list on lawsociety.org.uk

   Thorpe LJ took a sidewise glance at Imerman in Lykiardopulo v Lykiardopulo [2010] EWCA Civ 1315. Thorpe LJ sought to identify the special circumstances that apply in financial remedy cases, such that greater leeway might be given when adapting general civil law rules to the family context: “The proceedings are quasi-inquisitorial. The judge must be...

   See full list on lawsociety.org.uk

   Does this mean all confidential documents that a spouse has obtained improperly are inadmissible in financial remedy proceedings? The Imerman Court of Appeal addressed that very question, observing: “ It would be surprising if the court in ancillary relief proceedings had no power to exclude evidence which was confidential to the husband and had be...

   See full list on lawsociety.org.uk

   Imerman remains the starting point for the legal principles that apply when you’re presented with Imermandocuments by clients and asked to deploy them in litigation. Arbiliis more helpful in terms of spelling out precisely what needs to be done: 1. the Imermandocuments must be returned to their owner 2. the owner’s disclosure obligation is triggere...

   See full list on lawsociety.org.uk

3. www.familylaw.co.uk › news_and_comment › court-ofCourt of Appeal rules in Imerman "that there is no legal ...

   www.familylaw.co.uk › news_and_comment › court-of

   • Cached

   Jul 29, 2010 · The Court of Appeal has ruled in the case of Imerman that that the Hildebrand rules, which historically have enabled a wife or husband to secretly obtain, copy and use each others' documents in divorce proceedings, have "no basis in law" and are unlawful.

4. www.fieldoverell.com › disclosure-and-obtainingDisclosure and obtaining documents Imerman -v ... - Field Overell

   www.fieldoverell.com › disclosure-and-obtaining

   • Cached

   Jul 21, 2011 · Until recently where a married couple was separating, if one spouse obtained information or documents belonging to the other, rules established in the case of Hildebrand (1992) provided that copies could be retained but the originals must be disclosed to the other party.

5. www.familylaw.co.uk › news_and_comment › anotherAnother look at Imerman documents - Family Law

   www.familylaw.co.uk › news_and_comment › another

   • Cached

   Jun 4, 2015 · Court of Appeal look again at unlawfully obtained documents. In Arbili v Arbili [2015] EWCA Civ 542 the duties of a client and his/her lawyer over documents unlawfully obtained by the client was reviewed by the Court of Appeal. There were two appeals. The first was against an order in financial remedy proceedings which is of no immediate ...

6. www.yahoo.com › news › columbus-based-doctor-firmColumbus-based doctor and his firm found guilty of $1.5M ...

   www.yahoo.com › news › columbus-based-doctor-firm

   • Cached

   1 day ago · Thu, October 31, 2024, 5:11 PM EDT · 1 min read. A Franklin County Common Pleas jury on Thursday found a Columbus-based physician as well as his clinic guilty of fraudulently billing the Ohio ...

7. People also ask

   What did Mrs Imerman do in the financial remedy proceedings?

   • In the financial remedy proceedings, Mrs Imerman was directed to return the material to the husband’s solicitors. Those solicitors were directed to fillet the files to remove material to which legal professional privilege attached, and the documents were then to be returned to the wife.

   Imerman: disclosure and self-help in financial proceedings

   www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/family-and-children/imerman-disclosure-and-self-help-in-financial-proceedings

   See all results for this question

   How did Mr Imerman apply for a restraining order?

   • Mr Imerman applied successfully in the Queen’s Bench Division (QBD) for orders restraining the use of the documents and seeking their return. In the financial remedy proceedings, Mrs Imerman was directed to return the material to the husband’s solicitors.

   Imerman: disclosure and self-help in financial proceedings

   www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/family-and-children/imerman-disclosure-and-self-help-in-financial-proceedings

   See all results for this question

   What happened in Imerman V Imerman?

   • Imerman v Imerman (2010) This was a case in which the Husband shared an office with the Wife’s brothers and had access to a shared computer system. Concerned that the Husband may not fully disclose his financial position, one of the brothers copied documents and information belonging to the Husband. This was then given to the Wife’s solicitors.

   Disclosure and obtaining documents Imerman -v- Imerman - Field Over…

   www.fieldoverell.com/disclosure-and-obtaining-documents-imerman-v-imerman/

   See all results for this question

   Can Vivian Imerman return information taken by his ex-wife's brothers?

   • The Court upheld an order made by Justice Eady that Vivian Imerman is entitled to the return of information taken by his ex-wife's brothers by hacking into his computer, to have it taken out of circulation and to have its use or onward transmission restrained.

   Court of Appeal rules in Imerman "that there is no legal basis for

   www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/court-of-appeal-rules-in-imerman-that-there-is-no-legal-basis-for-hildebrand-rules

   See all results for this question

8. www.taftlaw.com › aboutOverview | About Us | Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

   www.taftlaw.com › about

   • Cached

   Overview | About Us | Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP. Over 1,000 attorneys strong. Taft expands on Jan. 1, 2025 to the Mountain West region with the addition of Sherman & Howard, a prominent 130-year-old law firm. Learn more here.