Search results
Civil litigation. ‘Self-help’ is where a party accesses private information or documents relating to the financial affairs of the other party and uses the material in litigation.
Jul 29, 2010 · The Court of Appeal has ruled in the case of Imerman that that the Hildebrand rules, which historically have enabled a wife or husband to secretly obtain, copy and use each others' documents in divorce proceedings, have "no basis in law" and are unlawful.
Jan 17, 2024 · The Imerman Rule and self help in financial proceedings. Posted On 17 January 2024 by Molly Guest. This blog explains the various rules governing financial disclosure and how the decision in Imerman v Tchenguiz contradicts the decision of Hildebrand v Hildebrand.
Aug 26, 2010 · On 29 July 2010, shortly before the end of the legal term, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Imerman v Tchenguiz ([2010] EWCA Civ 908). The case concerned privacy and confidentiality in relation to financial proceedings ancillary to divorce.
Jul 21, 2011 · The law in this area has recently undergone a significant change, following the case of Imerman (2010). Imerman v Imerman (2010) This was a case in which the Husband shared an office with the Wife’s brothers and had access to a shared computer system.
Shortly before the marriage, Mr Imerman accepted an invitation from his prospective brothers in law, Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz, to share their London office at 18 Upper Grosvenor Street in Mayfair.
People also ask
What happened in Imerman V Imerman?
How did Mr Imerman apply for a restraining order?
What did Mrs Imerman do in the financial remedy proceedings?
Who are Robert Tchenguiz & Vincent Imerman?
In his written submissions Mr. Turner states that it was the wife’s brother, Robert, who, through his solicitors, provided the material to the wife’s solicitors and also arranged for it to be “privilege checked” by Mr. Wolanski.
