Search results
Total downloads of all papers by Richard H. Rowland. If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.
Jan 10, 2020 · Richard Rowland (2017, Philosophy Compass, 12(2), 1–16) defends the following principle: if we must suspend judgement about whether it is permissible for us to φ, then it is not permissible for us to φ. He calls this the Epistemic → Metaphysical (EM) principle.
- Yuzhou Wang
- yuzhouw@bgsu.edu
- 2020
Senior Research Fellow at Australian Catholic University. Richard Rowland works on meatethics, normativity, and moral epistemology. His book, The Normative and the Evaluative : The Buck-Passing Account of Value (OUP, 2019) is the first book-length defence of the buck-passing account of value.
Richard H. Rowland's 21 research works with 312 citations and 613 reads, including: Population Trends in Europe's Poorest Country: Results of the Most Recent Census of Moldova
R.A. Rowland. University of Leeds* Abstract. Christopher Cowie has recently argued that companions in guilt arguments against the moral. error theory that appeal to epistemic reasons cannot work. I show that such companions in guilt. arguments can work if, as we have good reason to believe, moral reasons and epistemic reasons.
Richard Rowland (2017, Philosophy Compass, 12(2), 1–16) defends the following principle: if we must suspend judgement about whether it is permissible for us to φ, then it is not permissible for us to . He calls this the Epistemic Metaphysical (EM) φ principle. This paper considers two challenges to this principle.
Richard Rowland (University of Oxford) discusses whether we should take the blue pill in ‘hedonism and the experience machine’. Senior Research Fellow at Australian Catholic University. Richard Rowland works on meatethics, normativity, and moral epistemology.
