Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Renuka V. Jain, continued the chairs, pick one, make sure the plaintiff is at a comfortable height, and move it if necessary. In other words, own the space. To keep the plaintiff focused, try this. Tell the plaintiff to forget the lawyer asking the question and focus on the twelve people behind the lawyer – the invisible jury – and speak to ...

  2. Notable Case Results. 2.5 million dollar verdict Camp v. Los Angeles Unified School District, 2022. One of the top 25 verdicts in Southern California in 2014 for a wrongful termination lawsuit (Roundtree v. Los Angeles Unified School District) Ms. Jain was lead counsel in State v.

  3. lawyers.laws101.com › attorney_profile › renuka-v-jainRenuka V. Jain - Laws101.com

    Renuka V. Jain is a trial lawyer practicing plaintiff-side employment law in Los Angeles, California. She works with cases involving wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment, whistleblower claims, and wage and hour violations.

  4. Aug 7, 2024 · Daily Journal. Aug. 7, 2024. Renuka V. Jain. See more on Renuka V. Jain. Law Offices of Renuka V. JainLos Angeles. In the first six years of her practice, Renuka Jain tried approximately 28 cases to verdict on the defense side, including about six high-profile employment jury trials.

  5. Jan 7, 2014 · Supreme Court of Virginia Audio Recordings of Oral Arguments. Audio recordings of oral arguments made before the full Court during session since 1/7/14 are posted below. Recordings will be posted at the end of each week that the Court is in session.

  6. Harassment Lawsuits. $950,000 in sex discrimination and Banes Act violation. $300,000 settlement in same-sex harassment case. $337,000 settlement of a sexual harassment claim resulting in the removal of an elected official.

  7. She took the case to the Texas Supreme Court, arguing that the defendants had improperly struck African Americans from the jury because of their race. The Court agreed finding that at least two of the strikes were based on race, ordered a new trial, and changed jury selection practice in Texas.