Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. renukavjain.com › renukas-bioRenuka V. Jain – Renuka V. Jain

   renukavjain.com › renukas-bio

   • Cached

   Notable Case Results. 2.5 million dollar verdict Camp v. Los Angeles Unified School District, 2022. One of the top 25 verdicts in Southern California in 2014 for a wrongful termination lawsuit (Roundtree v. Los Angeles Unified School District) Ms. Jain was lead counsel in State v.

2. www.casemine.com › judgement › inRENUKA v. UNION OF INDIA | Supreme Court Of India - CaseMine

   www.casemine.com › judgement › in

   • Cached

   Sep 24, 2020 · Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 8440-8441 and 11012-11013 of 2021, which is stated to be listed on 17.08.2021. List all the matters together before the appropriate Bench, irrespective of service position together with office report. Get free access to the complete judgment in RENUKA v. UNION OF INDIA on CaseMine.

3. law.justia.com › cases › pennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions 2021 - Justia Law

   law.justia.com › cases › pennsylvania

   • Cached

   Justia Opinion Summary: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered whether Section 1729-A(a) of the Charter School Law imposed a mandatory deadline by which a school district had to decide to renew or not renew a charter school’s charter. In…

4. indiankanoon.org › doc › 60477445Lalit Kumar Jain vs Union Of India on 21 May, 2021

   indiankanoon.org › doc › 60477445

   • Cached

   May 21, 2021 · The petitioners rely on Swiss Ribbons (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India5, where this court upheld the difference in procedure for operational creditors and financial creditors on the basis that there are fundamental differences in the nature of loan agreements with financial creditors, from contracts with operational creditors for sup- plying goods ...

5. www.scconline.com › blog › post2017 SCC Vol. 7 September 7, 2017 Part 5 | SCC Times - SCC Online

   www.scconline.com › blog › post

   • Cached

   Sep 11, 2017 · Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 319 and 161 — Power under S. 319 — Object of: Powers of court to proceed under S. 319 CrPC even against those persons who are not arraigned as accused, cannot be disputed. Such provision is meant to achieve the objective that real culprit should not get away unpunished.

6. renukavjain.comRenuka V. Jain – A Client-Centric Practice

   renukavjain.com

   • Cached

   Skilled & Resolute Trial Advocacy for Wrongfully Terminated Employees. From fighting for the constitutional right of African-Americans to serve as jurors in a race discrimination case, to challenging the retaliatory termination of a whistleblower by the second largest school district in the country, the employment litigation matters we handle ...

7. People also ask

   Who is Renuka Jain?

   • At the Law Offices of Renuka V. Jain, P.C., we deliver trial experience and knowledge in employment and litigation unparalleled in a small law office. Led by experienced trial lawyer Renuka Jain, we serve the needs of wronged employees in Los Angeles and throughout Southern California.

   Renuka V. Jain – A Client-Centric Practice

   renukavjain.com/

   See all results for this question

   Which case cited Narasimha and Dawakhana v Union of India?

   • Mr. Narasimha also cited Sardar Inder Singh v. State of Rajasthan 11and Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India12 and urged that when legislation is complete, and the executive is left to apply the law to an area or determine the time and manner of car- rying it out, that is the only permissible task.

   Lalit Kumar Jain vs Union Of India on 21 May, 2021 - Indian Kanoon

   indiankanoon.org/doc/60477445/

   See all results for this question

   What happened in Pennsylvania v Green (majority)?

   • Pennsylvania v. Green (majority) Justia Opinion Summary: During the investigation, officers obtained a warrant to search for evidence of possession and distribution of child pornography on the electronic devices in the home of Appellant, Eric Green. The Pennsylvania Supreme… Pennsylvania v. Distefano (majority)

   Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions 2021 - Justia Law

   law.justia.com/cases/pennsylvania/supreme-court/2021/

   See all results for this question

   Who is Jonathan Peters v WCAB (majority)?

   • Peters v. WCAB (majority) Justia Opinion Summary: Jonathan Peters (Claimant) was employed by Cintas Corporation (Employer) as a uniform sales representative. In this position Claimant worked half-days in Employer’s Allentown, Pennsylvania branch office on Mondays,… PA Game Comm v. Thomas Proctor Trust, et al, Aplts (per curiam order)

   Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions 2021 - Justia Law

   law.justia.com/cases/pennsylvania/supreme-court/2021/

   See all results for this question

8. lawyers.laws101.com › attorney_profile › renuka-v-jainRenuka V. Jain - Laws101.com

   lawyers.laws101.com › attorney_profile › renuka-v-jain

   • Cached

   Renuka V. Jain is a trial lawyer practicing plaintiff-side employment law in Los Angeles, California. She works with cases involving wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment, whistleblower claims, and wage and hour violations.