Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Mar 14, 2019 · Our contribution lies in developing an empirically grounded understanding of recognition and setting out its implications for the theoretical debate. In what follows, we first introduce key issues in the theoretical debate on recognition in political philosophy and the social sciences.

    • Melissa Sebrechts, Evelien Tonkens, Barbara Da Roit
    • 2019
  2. For Hegel, recognition mediates between the particular (private individuals) and the universal (social ethics), thereby articulating the reflexivity of self to other within successive and increasingly complex forms of socialization from the family to the state.

  3. Jun 22, 2022 · Recognition fundamentally provides an explanation of the process of how we are being seen by others, which then shapes their behaviour towards us and our experiences in interpersonal, intragroup and intergroup encounters.

  4. Feb 7, 2012 · While Fraser argues that a politics of recognition must be supplemented by an equally important politics of redistribution, Honneth believes that a single theory of recognition can be used to analyze all of the phenomena with which they are both concerned.

    • Wendy Martineau, Nasar Meer, Simon Thompson
    • 2012
  5. Jun 10, 2022 · This paper has argued in favor of the consistency that subsists between Bourdieu’s idea of the “social field” and Honneth’s concept of “recognition orders,” considering their relational morphology, the phenomenon of social struggles, and the issue of their social objectivity.

  6. Sep 12, 2016 · In this context, the concept of recognition is used to explain how states are individuated and differentiated from each other, how the international system thereby becomes stratified along status lines, as well as why conflicts over status are possible or even inevitable.

  7. People also ask

  8. Dec 17, 2019 · Recognition theory should be able to distinguish not only between recognition, non-recognition and misrecognition but also clarify when misrecognition constitutes an injustice. Otherwise it will not be able to combine its phenomenological analysis with a normative criticism.