Search results
1. Recognition and the International: Meanings, Limits, Manifestations. Patrick Hayden and Kate Schick. Over the past two decades, critical debates and insights within philosophy, sociology and political theory have focused on the concept of recognition.
Mar 14, 2019 · Recognition in sociology. Working in the tradition of critical theory, both Honneth and Fraser conceptualize recognition as a process crucial to, as well as an outcome of, social justice.
- Melissa Sebrechts, Evelien Tonkens, Barbara Da Roit
- 2019
Feb 7, 2012 · In recent years, the idea of the politics of recognition has become an increasingly popular way of thinking about a wide range of political phenomena, from the logic of social struggles to the nature of social justice.
- Wendy Martineau, Nasar Meer, Simon Thompson
- 2012
2 days ago · There is no better single-volume compilation for an up-to-date, readable and authoritative source of definitions, summaries and references in contemporary sociology’ A. H. Halsey. Wide-ranging and authoritative, this bestselling sociology dictionary is the most informative of its kind.
Oct 18, 2024 · A consistent best-seller, this wide-ranging and authoritative dictionary covers terminology, concepts, and thinkers in the field of sociology, as well as from the related fields of psychology, economics, anthropology, philosophy, and political science.
Mar 13, 2022 · Recognition, for him, is a topic that belongs to a moral philosophy that focuses on “the moral progress of societies” (2003a, b, 217). 25 It is Honneth’s project to define “the social prerequisites for achieving individual autonomy” (212).
People also ask
What is the'recognition turn' in sociology?
What is the politics of recognition?
Where did the idea of recognition come from?
What is honneth's'sociologization' of recognition?
Is recognition a precondition for redistribution?
What does Lamont et al say about recognition?
Jun 27, 2020 · In response, this article approaches personhood through the frame of Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic capital, those properties ‘misrecognized’ as belonging to the person when they are in fact the product of relations in which the person is enmeshed.