Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. harvardlawreview.org › juliana-v-united-statesJuliana v. United States - Harvard Law Review

   harvardlawreview.org › juliana-v-united-states

   • Cached

   Mar 10, 2021 · After unsuccessfully petitioning the Ninth Circuit for mandamus and the Supreme Court for a stay, see In re United States, 884 F.3d 830, 833 (9th Cir. 2018); United States v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for Dist. of Or., 139 S. Ct. 16 (2018), the United States returned to the district court and sought summary judgment. The district court denied the United ...

   • Remedies

     Supreme Court Note. Halting Administrative Action in the...

   • Environmental Law

     July 11, 2024 On July 9, President Biden signed the...

2. www.eenews.net › articles › 5-takeaways-from-the5 takeaways from the (likely) demise of the Juliana climate case

   www.eenews.net › articles › 5-takeaways-from-the

   • Cached

   May 30, 2024 · Here are five takeaways from the nation’s longest-running youth climate lawsuit. 1. Juliana inspired other lawsuits. The 21 Juliana challengers have helped mobilize the next generation of ...

3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Trump_vTrump v. Anderson - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Trump_v

   • Cached

   Griswold to the Supreme Court of the United States on December 27, [67] which indefinitely extended the Colorado Supreme Court's stay on the ruling. [43] Trump appealed the ruling on January 3, 2024, [ 68 ] and the Supreme Court granted the case on an accelerated schedule on January 5, [ 69 ] with oral arguments held February 8.

4. www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 22pdfPages 635–669 - Supreme Court of the United States

   www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 22pdf

   A, aka SAMIC. second circu. No. 22–196. d June 23, 2023Petitioner Adam Samia, along with Joseph Hunter and Carl Stillwell, was arrested by the U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration and charged with a variety of offenses related to the murder-for-hire of Catherine Lee, a rea.

5. www.bbc.com › news › articlesHow the Supreme Court came to dominate the US political debate

   www.bbc.com › news › articles

   • Cached

   Jul 2, 2024 · The justices follow the "Rule of Four", where they review a case if four of them believe it has merit. By design, the court is supposed to be insulated from political change and the justices from ...

6. Videos

   • 

     2:08

     youtube.com

     US Supreme Court Hears Landmark Cases

     8 Oct 2019

     217 views

   • 

     4:26

     youtube.com

     How do US Supreme Court justices get appointed? - Peter Paccone

     17 Nov 2016

     879.2K views

   • 

     2:51:36

     youtube.com

     U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Former President Donald Trump's Colorado Ballot Eligibility

     8 Feb 2024

     859.4K views

   View all

7. supreme.justia.com › cases-by-topicSupreme Court Cases By Topic

   supreme.justia.com › cases-by-topic

   • Cached

   Supreme Court Cases By Topic. Since its first decision in August 1791, the Supreme Court has heard and resolved thousands of cases spanning virtually every aspect of American life. The Court is not only the highest judicial authority in the United States but also the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution, the founding document of our democracy.

8. www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 23pdfSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

   www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 23pdf

   The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes criminal liability on anyone who corruptly “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, docu-ment, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.” 18 U. S. C. §1512(c)(1).

9. People also ask

   Does Juliana v United States have remedial powers?

   • Juliana v. United States - Harvard Law Review Juliana v. United States Ninth Circuit Holds that Developing and Supervising Plan to Mitigate Anthropogenic Climate Change Would Exceed Remedial Powers of Article III Court. Comment on: 947 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2020).

   Juliana v. United States - Harvard Law Review

   harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-134/juliana-v-united-states/

   See all results for this question

   Do Supreme Court justices 'have a real discussion' about cases?

   • In an interview with the BBC earlier this year, former Supreme Court Justice Steven Breyer said they then "have a real discussion" about cases. Beginning with the chief justice, they each give their legal opinions on a case and why they are - or are not - persuaded by various arguments.

   How the Supreme Court came to dominate the US political debate - BBC

   www.bbc.com/news/articles/crg4rz6zedyo

   See all results for this question

   Is the syllabus a part of the opinion of the court?

   • The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. FISCHER v. UNITED STATES No. 23–5572. Argued April 16, 2024—Decided June 28, 2024

   SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

   www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Which Supreme Court decisions have resonated with particular force?

   • While each Supreme Court decision carries great weight, some decisions have resonated with particular force. Justia has selected landmark cases in the following areas: Read important U.S. Supreme Court decisions in areas ranging from abortion, gun rights, and elections to criminal procedure, due process, equal protection, and free speech.

   Supreme Court Cases By Topic

   supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/

   See all results for this question

   Does Yates v United States have a statutory overlap?

   • Yates v. United States, 574 U. S. 528, 543 (2015) (plurality opinion) (emphasis added). As it stands, the canon against surplusage does not provide any reason to ar-tificially narrow (c)(2)’s scope. In any event, the Court’s formulation does not begin to cure the statutory overlap.

   SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

   www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf

   See all results for this question

   How do'structural-reform' injunctions fit into the judiciary's remedial powers?

   • In particular, it is not clear how “structural-reform” injunctions — in which courts require schools, firms, and other social institutions to change their behavior in order to make amends for past lawbreaking, most notably racial discrimination 43 — fit within Juliana ’s vision of the judiciary’s remedial powers.

   Juliana v. United States - Harvard Law Review

   harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-134/juliana-v-united-states/

   See all results for this question