Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Rupa Marya is a physician, activist, artist and writer who is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco and the founder and executive director of the Deep Medicine Circle, a worker-directed nonprofit committed to healing the wounds of colonialism through food, medicine, story, learning and restoration.

    • Music

      Growing Upward from the album Growing Upward by Rupa & the...

    • Medicine

      Over the past 18 years, Dr Rupa Marya has created a unique...

    • Writing

      Written together with political ecologist, food systems...

    • Speaking

      Dr Marya is available to speak to a wide range of topics for...

    • Contact

      Please reach out here for speaking or media inquiries....

  2. HS Clinical Professor. Dr. Rupa Marya is a Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, where she practices and teaches internal medicine. Her work sits at the nexus of climate, health and racial justice.

    • Editors
    • Project Supervisors
    • Additional Editors and Contributors
    • Recommendations for Policymakers
    • Information Regarding Officer’s Perception of Person Stopped
    • Summary of Main Results
    • “Perceived” Identity
    • SWITRS Quick-Reference Limitations
    • VOD Quick-Reference Limitations
    • Key Terms
    • Data Integrity Video
    • C. Model Policy Language for Limited Circumstances in which Characteristics of an Individual May Be Considered
    • E. Model Policy Language for Training
    • G. Model Policy Language for Accountability and Adherence to the Policy
    • H. Model Policy Language for Supervisory Review
    • Best Practices for Responding to Biased-Based Calls for Service
    • Factors to Consider in Analyzing Data
    • “Civilian Complaint”
    • Lack of Uniformity Regarding How to Process Civilian Complaints
    • Accessibility and Knowledge of an Agency’s Complaint Process
    • Possible Barriers to Reporting of Civilian Complaints
    • Introductory or Background Information
    • General Complaint Information
    • Complainant Information
    • Incident Information
    • Processing of Complaints
    • Los Angeles Police Department
    • San Francisco Police Department
    • California Department of Justice POST Certified Course
    • Conclusion

    California Department of Justice, Civil Rights Enforcement Section (CRES) Allison S. Elgart, Deputy Attorney General Catherine Z. Ysrael, Deputy Attorney General Domonique C. Alcaraz, Deputy Attorney General Anna Rick, Associate Governmental Program Analyst Aisha Martin-Walton, Retired Annuitant California Department of Justice, California Justic...

    Nancy A. Beninati, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, CRES Randie C. Chance, Ph.D., Director, Research Center, CJIS Jenny Reich, Director, Justice Data and Investigative Services Bureau, CJIS

    Amanda Burke, Ph.D., Research Associate I, Research Center Erin Choi, Program Manager, Client Services Program, CJIS Charles Hwu, Data Processing Manager, Application Development Bureau, CJIS Tiffany Jantz, Ph.D., Research Associate I, Research Center Tanya Koshy, Deputy Attorney General, CRES Audra Opdyke, Assistant Director, Justice Data and Inve...

    The Board hopes the California Legislature and local governments can increase funding to law enforcement agencies to implement RIPA by supporting not only the data collection itself, but also in supporting law enforcement’s evaluation of the collected data as well as the development of anti-bias training and policies. To effectively fulfill their ...

    Perceived Race or Ethnicity Perceived Age Perceived Gender Perceived to be LGBT Limited or No English Fluency Perceived or Known Disability

    The Board’s analysis of Wave 1 data suggests that officers from these agencies stopped each racial or ethnic group at frequencies that differed from both the weighted ACS residential population estimates and the CHP driver information. These differences were most pronounced for Black individuals, who composed a significantly larger proportion of t...

    All racial and ethnic groups referenced in this section are based on the reporting officer’s perception of the race or ethnicity of stopped individuals. Officers may perceive individuals differently than how the individuals self-identify. compared to White individuals, particularly with respect to search activity. For example, officers searched H...

    RIPA stop data collection and SWITRS categorize racial/ethnic groups differently. RIPA data does not expressly identify drivers; rather, it identifies persons stopped for traffic violations. Officers may be incorrect in determining which party was at fault, in some cases. Identity groups could differ in their likelihood of being captured in the S...

    Reduced visibility under darker conditions does not mean no visibility, so officers may still be able to perceive race prior to initiating stops. The likelihood of some identity groups to commit certain offenses or be stopped for certain offenses could differ across lighting conditions. Seasonal differences in driving patterns of certain identity g...

    Yield rate: proportion of searched individuals found in possession of contraband or evidence. Officer-discretion level: level of discretion available to the officer in deciding to conduct a search. Higher: includes searches where the only listed basis for search was “consent given”. Lower: incident to arrest, vehicle inventory, and search warrant...

    In May 2019, the RIPA Board released a five-minute video in which six diverse stakeholders address data integrity for the RIPA stop data. The video outlines the role of law enforcement agencies and the Department in performing data integrity checks, as described by Dr. Sharad Goel, Stanford University Assistant Professor and Founder and Executive ...

    [Agency] members may only consider or rely on characteristics listed in a specific description of a suspect, victim, or witness based on trustworthy and relevant information that links a specific person to a particular unlawful incident. Except as provided above, [agency] officers shall not consider personal characteristics in establishing either r...

    The [agency] will ensure that, at a minimum, all officers and employees are compliant with requirements regarding bias-free policing training. The [agency] will ensure that management includes a discussion of its bias-free policing policy with its officers and staff on an annual basis. [Agency] officers should be mindful of their training on impl...

    All [agency] personnel, including dispatchers and non-sworn personnel, are responsible for understanding and complying with this policy. Any violation of this policy will subject the member to remedial action. Types of remedial action should be outlined. All [agency] personnel, including dispatchers and non-sworn personnel, shall not retaliate aga...

    Supervisors shall ensure that all personnel under their command, including dispatchers and non-sworn personnel, understand the content of this policy and comply with it at all times. Supervisory processes and procedures for monitoring should be included. Any employee who becomes aware of any instance of bias-based policing or any violation of thi...

    We were unable to find any law enforcement agency in California that had a policy that addresses the circumstances in which members of the public make bias-based calls for service.78 The Board reviewed evidence-based best practices for responding to bias-based calls for service and identified the following best practices: Agencies should have a po...

    When reviewing the data presented above, it is important to recognize that the reporting policies and practices of the agencies may account for some disparities in the number of complaints submitted by agencies of similar size. In other words, the fact that one agency has documented or reported disproportionately more or fewer complaints than anot...

    Verbal complaints – whether there is a duty to document, investigate, and report. Complaints – verbal or written – by arrested individuals. Complaints by uninvolved third parties who witness misconduct. Multiple complaints by third parties about one incident Is every complaint logged or are all logged as one incident? Is an officer required to ...

    Another factor that could explain an agency’s relatively low number of civilian complaints is an agency’s system for processing complaints and, in particular, the lack of a centralized repository for civilian complaints. For example, complaints that allege use of force may be reported directly to an Internal Affairs or Professional Standards unit ...

    Another factor that may explain the disparities in numbers of complaints between agencies and across years is different levels of community access to agency complaint processes. This has been a subject of discussion for the Board, as well as the subject of several grand jury reports in California.98 In particular, the Board’s review of the compla...

    Lack of knowledge of complaint process: complaint processes may not be prominently featured on an agency’s website or literature. Inadequate explanation of process: complainants may be confused or have misconceptions about the complaint process. Language barriers: complaint processes may not be available in languages other than English. Difficulty ...

    The agency’s complaint form should include an explanation of the policy to provide the complainant with clear direction on complaint procedures. The agency’s policies, applicable forms, and training materials should communicate a clear, consistent definition of the term “civilian complaint.” Complaint forms should include specific instructions ...

    The form should capture: If the complaint is being submitted anonymously, by a third party, or on behalf of a minor; If a translator has been requested; How the complaint was submitted (e.g., online, mail, in person). The form should include the name and contact information for agency personnel who filed or collected the complaint. The form sho...

    The form should ask for the following relevant information about the complainant (if the complainant so chooses): Name Age Gender Race or Ethnicity Sexual Orientation Primary Language Address Home, work, mobile phone numbers. E-mail Address

    The form should capture relevant information about the incident, including: The location of the incident Date of incident Time of incident If the incident was the result of a traffic or pedestrian stop If the incident resulted in bodily injury Including a narrative description field If photos or videos of the injury were included with the complaint...

    The agency’s civilian complaint procedures should clearly explain how various types of complaints will be received, logged, and reviewed. The procedure should require that all complaints – including those that may be reviewed by a civilian review board or different branch within the department (for example, Internal Affairs) – be logged into a cen...

    Going forward, the Board will continue to study changes to best practices that may inform law enforcement policies and practices that intersect with racial and identity profiling. We will continue our focus on evaluating the stop data for any disparities that may impact certain racial and ethnic groups, but hope to expand our review in the coming ...

    Going forward, the Board will continue to study changes to best practices that may inform law enforcement policies and practices that intersect with racial and identity profiling. We will continue our focus on evaluating the stop data for any disparities that may impact certain racial and ethnic groups, but hope to expand our review in the coming ...

    Going forward, the Board will continue to study changes to best practices that may inform law enforcement policies and practices that intersect with racial and identity profiling. We will continue our focus on evaluating the stop data for any disparities that may impact certain racial and ethnic groups, but hope to expand our review in the coming ...

    Going forward, the Board will continue to study changes to best practices that may inform law enforcement policies and practices that intersect with racial and identity profiling. We will continue our focus on evaluating the stop data for any disparities that may impact certain racial and ethnic groups, but hope to expand our review in the coming ...

  3. The 2024 Report contains an analysis of more than 4.5 million stops by 535 California law enforcement agencies conducted in 2022 under the Racial and Identity Profiling Act (“RIPA”).

  4. San Francisco, [25] officially the City and County of San Francisco, is a commercial, financial, and cultural center within Northern California. With a population of 808,988 residents as of 2023, [16] San Francisco is the fourth-most populous city in the U.S. state of California behind Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Jose.

  5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Rupa_MaryaRupa Marya - Wikipedia

    In 2019, Marya was among the physicians appointed by Governor Newsom to the Healthy California for All Commission. [ 8 ] [ 9 ] She is the composer and front-woman of the band Rupa & the April Fishes [ 10 ] and was a lead plaintiff in the lawsuit that brought the song " Happy Birthday to You " back to the public domain.

  6. People also ask

  7. The Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015: Prohibits racial and identity profiling by law enforcement. Requires law enforcement agencies to report data to the Attorney General’s Office on a) all vehicle and pedestrian stops and b) citizen complaints alleging racial and identity profiling.

  1. People also search for