Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.consumerreports.org › doctors-hospitals › findFind Top California Doctors and Hospitals - Consumer Reports

   www.consumerreports.org › doctors-hospitals › find

   • Cached

   Mar 30, 2016 · Find the top California doctors and hospitals with Ratings from Consumer Reports on primary care physicians.

   • See a List of Those Tools

     Get the latest in-depth ratings, reviews, and buying advice...

   • Have a Better Hospital Stay

     Consumer Reports explains how to handle five issues you may...

2. www.consumerreports.org › doctors-hospitals › newNew Doctor Ratings in 8 States - Consumer Reports

   www.consumerreports.org › doctors-hospitals › new

   • Cached

   Mar 29, 2016 · New doctor Ratings in eight states are now available. Consumer Reports evaluated primary care physician groups. Find out how they rate.

3. www.capolicylab.org › wp-content › uploadsRIPA in the Los Angeles Police Department: Summary Report

   www.capolicylab.org › wp-content › uploads

   This report differs from the 2020 RIPA board report in two ways: 1) by focusing on comparing stops that occur within similar places; and 2) by examining the role of local violent crime in explaining racial disparities in police contact.

   • File Size: 2MB

   • Page Count: 41

4. www.uclahealth.org › los-angeles-top-doctorsUCLA Doctor’s Ratings: Top doctors in Los Angeles

   www.uclahealth.org › los-angeles-top-doctors

   • Cached

   More than 100 UCLA Health physicians were named to Los Angeles Magazine’s 2024 list of “Top Doctors” in Los Angeles. The results are based on a Los Angeles Magazine survey that asked physicians throughout Los Angeles County to identify doctors they considered to be at the top of their fields.

5. lapdonlinestrgeacc.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.netRIPA in the Los Angeles Police Department: Technical Report

   lapdonlinestrgeacc.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net

   RIPA in the Los Angeles Police Department: Technical Report. EMILY OWENS and JACLYN ROSENQUIST. OCTOBER 2020. CONTENTS. Neighborhoods and RIPA stops in Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. Police contact and neighborhood demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 .

6. oag.ca.gov › pdfs › ripaExecutive Summary - 2020 RIPA Board Report - Racial and ...

   oag.ca.gov › pdfs › ripa

   The report examines the civilian complaint data, including data on reported racial and identity profiling allegations submitted to the Department of Justice by all RIPA reporting agencies in 2018; the report then highlights the factors that impact the disparities in the number of reported complaints by each agency.

7. People also ask

   Why does the Ripa board collect information in two places?

   • It is not abundantly clear why the RIPA Board collects this information in two places, but the confusion is evident. Furthermore, due to the fundamental importance of these particular measures, the confusion is confounded in all analyses throughout the RIPA Report 2022. The RIPA Board (p. 29) reports that in 2020;

   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report A

   porac.org/wp-content/uploads/PORAC-2022-RIPA-Report-Analysis_FINAL.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Why did the Peace Officers Research Association of California review the Ripa report?

   • To ensure the public is afforded the opportunity to place RIPA’s work in the appropriate context, the Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC) engaged the assistance of Dr. Brian L. Withrow to assist in its review of the 2022 Annual RIPA Report.

   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report A

   porac.org/wp-content/uploads/PORAC-2022-RIPA-Report-Analysis_FINAL.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Is the Ripa report 2022 justified?

   • Unfortunately, these data do not exist (reliably) within the RIPA Report 2022, its associated appendices, and only to a limited degree in the actual data set. Without such data and its analysis, it is not possible to determine whether the conclusions offered in the RIPA Report 2022 are justified.

   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report A

   porac.org/wp-content/uploads/PORAC-2022-RIPA-Report-Analysis_FINAL.pdf

   See all results for this question

   What does the Ripa report 2022 tell us about policing practices?

   • The footnote (#107) at the bottom of page 54 of the RIPA Report 2022 provides some insight into the RIPA analysts’ misunderstanding of searches, policing practices and the ethical standards of policing.

   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report A

   porac.org/wp-content/uploads/PORAC-2022-RIPA-Report-Analysis_FINAL.pdf

   See all results for this question

   What are the key parts of the Ripa report 2022?

   • The following critical analysis focuses on the key parts of the RIPA Report 2022 that attempt to provide evidence of disparity with respect to race, ethnicity, gender identity, and disability.

   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report A

   porac.org/wp-content/uploads/PORAC-2022-RIPA-Report-Analysis_FINAL.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Should the Ripa board be consistent in its analysis of discretion?

   • At the very least, the RIPA Board should be consistent in its analysis of discretion. Supervision stops and searches deserve special attention. The population of individuals subjected to a search because of their supervision status (e.g. parole, probation, etc.) is not demographically equivalent to the overall population of residents in California.

   Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report A

   porac.org/wp-content/uploads/PORAC-2022-RIPA-Report-Analysis_FINAL.pdf

   See all results for this question

8. porac.org › wp-content › uploadsRacial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board 2022 Annual Report

   porac.org › wp-content › uploads

   • RIPA Fails to Conduct a Thorough Literature Review: The report cherry picks print and TV news articles as “sources” to support RIPA’s stance – neglecting to provide a literature review of pre-existing studies.