Search results
The Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) of 2015 was enacted in order to better identify and mitigate race-based and identity-based bias in policing.
- 2MB
- 41
- RACIAL AND IDENTITY PROFILING ADVISORY (RIPA) BOARD
- Project Supervisors
- Content Developers, Writers and Editors
- Additional Contributors
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- From Data to Policies Addressing the Profiling of Transgender People
- Known Supervision Stops and Searches
- Accountability Models
- Relevant Legislation Enacted in 2021
- B. Stop Data Demographics
- C. Tests for Racial/Ethnic Disparities
- San Francisco Police Department (SFPD)149
- Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD)150
- B. Wave 3 and 4 Agencies’ Bias-Free Policing Policies Review
- C. Vision for Future Reports
- D. Accountability Models and Best Practices
- E. Vision for Future Reports
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Telephone Access
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Anonymous/Third Party Complaints
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Complaint Form Details ✪ Complaint Procedure Information
- ✪ Complaint Procedure Information
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Complaint Procedure Information
- ✪ Methods of Submission ✪ Translation
- Riverside Police Department (Riverside Police)
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Deterrent Language
- Stockton Police Department (Stockton Police)
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Anonymous/Third Party Complaints
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Complaint Form Details
- ✪ Anonymous/Third Party Complaints ✪ Complaint Procedure Information
- ✪ Methods of Submission ✪ Anonymous/Third Party Complaints
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Complaint Form Details
- Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office (Sonoma Sheriff), Sonoma Police Department (Sonoma Police), and Windsor Police Department (Windsor Police)
- ✪ Methods of Submission ✪ Deterrent Language
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Complaint Procedure Information
- ✪ Translation
- ✪ Methods of Submission
- ✪ Translation
- Information on the agency’s civilian ✪ Anonymous/Third Party Complaints
- ✪ Complaint Procedure Information ✪ Translation
- D. Vision for Future Reports
- CONCLUSION
STEVEN RAPHAEL (Co-Chair), Professor of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley; Appointed by the Governor of California CHIEF DAVID SWING (Co-Chair), Chief, Pleasanton Police Department, Representing the California Police Chiefs Association WILLIAM ARMALINE, Director of the Human Rights Institute & Professor of Sociology & Interdiscipl...
Nancy A. Beninati, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Civil Rights Enforcement Section Dr. Tiffany Jantz, Research Data Supervisor, Research Center
California Department of Justice, Civil Rights Enforcement Section (CRES) Allison S. Elgart, Deputy Attorney General, Lead Editor Domonique C. Alcaraz, Deputy Attorney General Anthony Jackson, Senior Legal Analyst Tanya Koshy, Deputy Attorney General Aisha Martin-Walton, Retired Annuitant Kendal Micklethwaite, Deputy Attorney General Anna Rick, ...
Erin Choi, Program Manager, CJIS Katherine Chu, Legal Intern, CRES Alice Delvey-Williams, Staff Service Manager II, CJIS William Downer, Deputy Attorney General, CRES Arwen Flint, Assistant Bureau Director, CJIS Kenneth Keating, Staff Services Manager, CJIS Gabriel Martinez, Deputy Attorney General, CRES Audra Opdyke, Assistant Director, CJIS Natas...
California’s Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (“Board”) is pleased to release the 2022 Annual Report (“Report”). The Report closely examines a wide range of issue areas related to racial and identity profiling, providing context and research to deepen the public’s understanding of the stop data collected under the Racial and Identity P...
The Board used RIPA stop data to gain a deeper understanding of profiling on the basis of gender. The Board takes an intersectional approach to identifying and examining disparities among race/ethnicity and gender stop data. This examination is timely given the onslaught of efforts nationwide to pass discriminatory laws against transgender people...
The Board also examines known supervision stops and searches, where a person is stopped or searched because they are under a form of court-ordered supervision, such as probation or parole, following the conviction of a crime. This section of the Report first provides an overview of court-ordered supervision, including a discussion of the Fourth ...
The Board examines key components that comprise law enforcement agencies’ accountability systems. First, the Board reviews auditing policies and practices and the use of data for policy change and staff supervision within agencies. As the Board’s research shows, audits can enhance the integrity of stop data by assessing the level of accuracy and ...
The Report includes a section on recently enacted legislation related to RIPA that may require updated trainings for officers and revisions to agencies’ policies and procedures. The legislation highlighted in the Report deals with such issues as decertification, the minimum age requirements for officers, the duty to intercede, and community-based ...
1. Identity Demographic of Individuals Stopped by Officers RIPA requires officers to collect perceived identity-related information about the individuals they stop on six key demographics: race/ethnicity, gender, age, lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender (LGBT) identity, English fluency, and disability. Officers are not permitted to ask individuals to...
holistic approach to data analysis is critical because there is no single approach or consensus in the research literature about what analyses are best able to identify racial or identity profiling. For this reason, the following section contains multiple commonly used analyses designed to identify differences in various elements of police stops a...
NCTE found that SFPD policies met the criteria for availability of policies on transgender interactions, non-discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, non-binary recognition, use of respectful communication, removal of appearance-related items, and use of condoms as evidence of sex work. SFPD was the only agency that NCTE ide...
NCTE found that LAPD policies met the criteria for availability of policy on transgender interactions, non-discrimination based on sexual orientation, use of respectful communication, and search procedures. NCTE found that LAPD policies partially met recommendations regarding non-discrimination based on gender identity. LAPD policy explicitly ...
Davis Police Department (Davis Police): Davis Police has an 8-page policy that includes cross-references to other departmental policies. Uniquely, this policy states that members of the public may file complaints alleging bias-based policing and that the agency will investigate them all. This kind of cross-policy language is something the Board h...
In the coming years, the Board hopes to conduct more comprehensive research – examining both current agency policies and protocols and evidence-based research – into other areas of accountability systems to identify best practices. The Board is also committed to continuing a review of agency policies related to bias-free policing as it relates to ...
In its 2021 Annual Report, the Board identified ten components that make up accountability systems. In this section, the Board reviews policies and practices relating to several elements of accountability systems: auditing practices to enhance integrity of the stop data, use of data for policy change and staff supervision within agencies, and comm...
In the future, the Board will begin to review agency-specific policies and training surrounding dispatch procedures related to bias by proxy as well as mental health calls for service. The Board hopes to examine the different policies and protocols for responding to bias-based calls for service. The Board would like to examine the dispatcher trai...
Complaints may be submitted in person at any Alameda Sheriff’s station, by phone to the Internal Affairs (IA) Office, or by mail. ✪
The Alameda Sheriff’s website provides several phone numbers to call to file a complaint. Members of the community can call IA directly, the Personnel Complaints phone lines for submitting a complaint during the day or nighttime, or the Emergency/Hearing Impaired phone line if needed. The agency reports that when a complainant uses the phone to f...
The complaint form is only offered in English. Alameda Sheriff has a translation line and certified bilingual staff available to assist with translation of the form.
The current policy states that the Alameda Sheriff accepts anonymous complaints. The agency reports that it does not accept third-party complaints.
Complaint forms may be retrieved online, at any police station, the City Clerk’s Office, any Anaheim public library, or the Community Services Office. The form can then be submitted in person, by mail, or online. Additionally, members of the public may submit their complaint through an online form. Translation The online and print or PDF complain...
The online and printed or PDF forms are nearly The complaint form includes some identical except for a question about whether or information about the civilian complaint not the complaint is based on racial or identity process, such as whether the bias; this question is only included on the complainant will be informed of the printed or PDF form an...
Information about the civilian complaint process is attached to the complaint form. ✪ Anonymous/Third Party Complaints
The complaint form is only available in English. ✪ Because the form states the aforementioned details are “needed to process a complaint” without an additional disclaimer, a complainant may think they cannot submit a complaint unless they provide every item of information listed above. Moreover, couching the complaint as requiring the six areas of...
Complaints against Kern Sheriff employees may be submitted in person at the Personnel Division or any substation and by mail. The agency’s website encourages members of the community
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
This year marks the Board’s fifth annual report since the enactment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015. Last year, the Board committed to delving deeper into topics of import to the community and law enforcement to make recommendations that will continue to effect positive change and ultimately improve relationships and trust between...
The 2024 Report contains an analysis of more than 4.5 million stops by 535 California law enforcement agencies conducted in 2022 under the Racial and Identity Profiling Act (“RIPA”). Over the past few years, the data collected under RIPA has provided empirical evidence showing disparities in policing throughout California.
Oct 1, 2023 · In 2015, California passed the Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA), which requires law enforcement agencies in California to collect and report “perceived demographic and other detailed data regarding pedestrian and traffic stops.”
2021 RIPA Report Quick Facts. Between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019, the 15 largest law enforcement agencies in California collected data on nearly 4 million vehicle and pedestrian stops. RIPA defines a stop as a detention or search.
Oct 27, 2020 · The Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) of 2015 was enacted in order to better identify and mitigate race-based and identity-based bias in policing.
People also ask
What is Ripa & why is it important?
What is the 2023 Ripa report?
Will Ripa data be used to evaluate the effectiveness of law enforcement training?
What is Ripa data?
Sep 17, 2024 · Catalyst California advocates for racial justice by building power and transforming public systems. We partner with communities of color, conduct innovative research, develop policies for actionable change, and shift money and power back into our communities.
