Search results
San Diego Cnty. Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union, No. 18CV967, 2020 WL 5797827, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2020). Instead, CEFCU had sought dismissal of SDCCU's claims, contending that SDCCU could not reasonably apprehend an infringement suit on the current record.
BETTER. San Diego Cnty. Credit Union v. Citizen Equity First Credit Union, -- 22 F. Supp. 3d--, 2021 WL 2104969 (S.D. Cal. May 25, 2021); (see also Dkt. No. 353.) 23 On June 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for attorneys’ fees under 15 24 U.S.C. § 1117 arguing this case to be an exceptional one.
Jun 21, 2021 · Defendant / Appellant: CITIZENS EQUITY FIRST CREDIT UNION: Plaintiff / Appellee: SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNION: Case Number: 21-55642: Filed: June 21, 2021
- Trademark / Article III Standing
- COUNSEL
- OPINON
- II.
The panel affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court’s judgment and award of attorneys’ fees in favor of the plaintiff and remanded in a trademark case. Defendant Citizens Equity First Credit Union (CEFCU) petitioned the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to cancel a trademark registration belonging to plaintiff San Diego County C...
James W. Dabney (argued), Emma L. Baratta, and Michael M. Polka, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York, New York; Steven J. Cologne, Higgs Fletcher & Mack, LLP, San Diego, California; for Defendant-Appellant. Martin R. Bader (argued), Stephen Sandor Korniczky, Lisa M. Martens, Jesse A. Salen, and Karin Dougan Vogel, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampto...
BEA, Circuit Judge: After a party obtains declaratory relief which decrees that it is not infringing a trademark, does it retain Article III standing to invalidate that mark? That is the central question presented in these appeals, and we answer it: No. Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee Citizens Equity First Credit Union (CEFCU) began this dis...
The parties raise a bevy of issues on appeal. To assist in our explanation and analysis of those issues, it is helpful to establish some short-hand terminology. We will refer to counts one and two of SDCCU’s complaint—which sought declaratory relief that SDCCU is not infringing CEFCU’s registered mark or common-law mark—as SDCCU’s “non-infringeme...
Oct 8, 2021 · Plaintiff / Appellee: SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNION: Defendant / Appellant: CITIZENS EQUITY FIRST CREDIT UNION: Case Number: 21-56095: Filed: October 8, 2021
Jul 26, 2023 · The San Diego County Credit Union asked the US Supreme Court to consider ruling that a noninfringement judgment didn’t negate its bid to cancel a trademark in the same case. A bench trial invalidated Citizens Equity First Credit Union’s “Not A Bank. Better.” trademark rights before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed ...
People also ask
Can SDCCU withstand a motion to dismiss?
Does SDCCU have statutory subject matter jurisdiction over CEFCU's counterclaim?
Can SDCCU appeal a dismissal without prejudice?
Did SDCCU reasonably apprehend an infringement suit at the pleading stage?
How did SDCCU obtain a stay to the TTAB proceedings?
San Diego County Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union, No. 3:2018cv00967 - Document 256 (S.D. Cal. 2020) Court Description: ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff's Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony or Robert Taylor and Theordore Davis as Moot (ECF Nos. 152 , 159 , 163 ).
