Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process ...

  2. ERROR to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia which affirmed a judgment ordering Page 274 U. S. 201 the Superintendent of the State Colony of Epileptics and Feeble Minded to perform the operation of salpingectomy on Carrie Buck, the plaintiff in error.

  3. Mar 7, 2016 · In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, by a vote of 8 to 1, to uphold a state's right to forcibly sterilize a person considered unfit to procreate. The case, known as Buck v.

  4. Jackson contended that the land was enclosed by a fence and was recognized as her property. On this appeal, Bell raises five issues. First, Bell contends that in her complaint, Jackson failed to describe the land in question with the certainty required by Ala. Code 1975, § 6-6-541:

  5. Aug 26, 2024 · The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Buck v. Bell on April 22, 1927, and then on May 2 delivered an 8 to 1 decision upholding the order to sterilize Carrie Buck and the law that authorized it. (Associate Justice Pierce Butler dissented but did not write an opinion.)

  6. People also ask

  7. Whitehead failed in his defense because he intended to fail. The end he sought appears to have been the same as that sought by Priddy and Strode. Now named Buck v. Bell, because John H. Bell had replaced Priddy at the colony, Whitehead in 1925 appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court.