Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. SOCRATES in the Crito seems to argue that one must always obey the state, its laws, and its courts of law (Crito 51b-c); Socrates in the Apology seems perfectly willing to disobey a court order that would

  2. Whether or not those facts on which all the sources agree permit us to attribute to Socrates a fully worked out philosophy of law, they are sufficient to confirm his importance for the history of legal thought. Both Xenophon and Plato agree that Socrates was always obedient to the law of Athens.

    • Richard F. Stalley, Roderick T. Long
    • 2015
  3. [t]he gist of Socrates' position comes to this: Athenian law is right law. But the specific application of such law to human affairs, the administration of law, the decisions and sentences are sometimes erroneous and, therefore, unjust.

  4. law and ethics justifies a new look at the classic statement of legal obligation: the death of Socrates found in the dialogues of Plato. Three possible bases for an ethical obligation to obey the law are examined.

    • Anthony D'Amato
    • 2010
  5. Feb 1, 2009 · This article presents a critical analysis of Plato's Apology and Crito — focusing on the moral limits of legal obligation that ground both Socrates' resistance to state injustice and his acceptance of his unjust sentence.

    • Mark S. Howenstein
    • 2009
  6. Sep 21, 2020 · Socrates would disobey not because a law takes away his preferred pastime, but because it deprives him of his citizenship; without philosophy, Socrates is no longer a citizen. For Heinze, outlawing philosophy equals Socrates’ disenfranchisement from democracy (cf. Brickhouse and Smith 2004 : 232).

  7. People also ask

  8. Dec 16, 2023 · Socrates does emphasize the importance of the citizens’ agreement in setting down what is a law and goes on to explain how important agreement and collective obedience to those laws are for the prosperity of cities and the citizens within them (4.15–18).

  1. People also search for