Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 9, 2023 · A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß = 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß = 0.60). Child screen...

  2. We also consider child sex as a control variable. Results: A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß = 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß = 0.60).

  3. RESULTS: A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß 0.60). Child screen...

  4. This article delves into the profound effects of excessive screen time on children's cognitive, language, and social-emotional development, while also exploring the crucial strategies and responsibilities that parents and schools can undertake to effectively manage and diminish screen time in young individuals.

  5. Nov 6, 2023 · Our aim is to estimate whether parent strategies for mediating child screen time including restrictive and instructive mediation and social coviewing, predict preschooler adherence to the screen time recommendation of ≤1 h/day during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  6. Nov 10, 2021 · Regarding increases in overall screen time, several nominal categories of screen time were associated with anxiety (with less than 2 hrs/day as the reference variable) with higher levels of screen time showing higher odds ratios: 5–6 hrs/day (OR=1·76 95%CI 1·20–2·58), 7–8 hrs/day (OR=1·98 95%CI 1·29–3·03), and more than 8 hrs/day ...

  7. People also ask

  8. Feb 9, 2023 · A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß = 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß = 0.60). Child screen time at age 3.5 predicted increased proneness to anger/frustration at age 4.5 (ß = 0.14). Anger/frustration at age 3.5 did not predict screen time at age 4.5.

  1. People also search for