Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.rogerebert.com › reviews › rings-2017Rings movie review & film summary (2017) - Roger Ebert

   www.rogerebert.com › reviews › rings-2017

   • Cached

   Feb 3, 2017 · More wearying than frightening, “Rings” is a total non-starter that may well win the weekend box-office derby (if only because of the weak competition) but which will be blessedly forgotten by most of those who see it after seven days—a month tops.

2. Videos

   • 

     5:26

     youtube.com

     Rings - Movie Review

     3 Feb 2017

     560.8K views

   • 

     2:26

     youtube.com

     Rings | Trailer #1 | Paramount Pictures International

     24 Aug 2016

     12.4M views

   • 

     1:51

     youtube.com

     The Lord of the Rings (film series) All Cast Then and Now ★ 2024

     12 Oct 2024

     1.7K views

   View all

3. www.reddit.com › r › horrorIs Rings 2017 better than The Ring Two? : r/horror - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › horror

   • Cached

   To understand why I think this film is good, while others tended to dismiss it, we need to get into what this film is based on: Spiral, the forgotten Ring sequel. Spiral was a film that was produced at the same time as Nakata’s Ringu.

4. www.imdb.com › title › tt0498381Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com › title › tt0498381

   • Cached

   Overall great movie, I don't give it a better rating because it's not anything very original, not much new to see here (to be fair that's difficult on a third instalment of a series of movies) and even if the photography is really good, it's nothing spectacular.

5. www.reddit.com › r › moviesHow bad is Rings (2017)? : r/movies - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › movies

   • Cached

   Rings is like a bad parody of those original movies. It is more akin to a teenage slasher film than the original movies. Is it bad? Yes. Is it worth watching? meh it's an okay shitty teenage horror movie.

6. www.rottentomatoes.com › m › rings_2017Rings (2017) - Rotten Tomatoes

   www.rottentomatoes.com › m › rings_2017

   • Cached

   A young woman (Matilda Lutz) becomes worried about her boyfriend (Alex Roe) when he explores a dark subculture surrounding a mysterious videotape said to kill the watcher seven days after he has ...

   • 8% (116)
   • Director: F. Javier Gutiérrez

   • Content Rating: PG-13
   • Actors: Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz

7. www.reddit.com › r › moviesOfficial Discussion: Rings [SPOILERS] : r/movies - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › movies

   • Cached

   Rings could have been a great movie if they had focused on the Professor and made it a story about him using science to test Samara and her boundaries instead of 2 empty-headed jerkbait kids.

8. People also ask

   Is 'Rings' a good movie?

   • The cast of Rings, including Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz and Alex Roe, does a great job of balancing romance and detective work in this tale of college kids plagued by an evil spirit. Summarily, while Rings may not win awards for best performance, it is not annoying to watch.

   Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0498381/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Is 'Rings' (2017) a bad movie?

   • If you're asking if 'Rings' (2017) is a bad movie compared to the original Japanese films, the answer is yes. Even if it were just an American TV re-imagination, it would still be a subpar production. Sadly, Samara is finally dead, much to the delight of her older Japanese sister, Sadako Yamamura.

   Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0498381/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Is 'Ring 2' (2017) a good movie?

   • Despite being maligned, 'Ring 2' (both Japanese and Hollywood versions) had an extension of the sinister spirit of Samara and her tragic evil. However, in this film, whatever she has become is just another standard lurking presence. Her appearance stirs the dullness around it, rather than lifting it. Normally, there is something of merit in a film.

   Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0498381/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Is there a sequel to the 2017 film 'Rings'?

   • Gore Verbinski's 2002 horror flick "The Ring" was a clever movie (understanding that it was a remake of a Japanese movie). The 2017 film 'Rings' is a sequel in name only with the only returning cast members being the characters from the videotape.

   Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0498381/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Should I watch the ring if I like the Japanese films?

   • If you enjoy Japanese films and particularly like 'The Ring', you might prefer sticking to the original Japanese versions. The 2017 version features the death of Samara, much to the relief of her older sister, Sadako Yamamura.

   Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0498381/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Is a 'Rings' movie supposed to be scary?

   • Yes, a 'Rings' movie is supposed to be scary. However, some viewers believe that none of the American remakes or the 1999 Japanese sequel can compare to the original 1998 Japanese movie, which set the bar high.

   Rings (2017) - Rings (2017) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0498381/reviews

   See all results for this question

9. www.imdb.com › title › tt0498381Rings (2017) - IMDb

   www.imdb.com › title › tt0498381

   • Cached

   Rings: Directed by F. Javier Gutiérrez. With Matilda Lutz, Alex Roe, Johnny Galecki, Vincent D'Onofrio. A young woman finds herself on the receiving end of a terrifying curse that threatens to take her life in 7 days.