Search results
Nov 17, 2021 · Passion is in charge, and reason merely serves passion. “Reason,” he says, is “the slave of the passions.” You might think Hume must be wrong, because we act against our passions all the time. If you leave the cake alone, isn’t that an example of reason winning out over passions?
- David Hume
David Hume - Reason is the Slave to the Passions: Hume on...
- Is It Wrong to Believe Without Sufficient Evidence? W.K. Clifford's “The Ethics of Belief
Some say we must have confident beliefs to act on, but...
- Logic and Reasoning
Logic and Reasoning - Reason is the Slave to the Passions:...
- Arguments
The premises are meant to provide reason to believe the...
- Submissions
1000-Word Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology is a...
- All Essays
All Essays - Reason is the Slave to the Passions: Hume on...
- Mengzi's Moral Psychology, Part 2: The Cultivation Analogy
Author: John Ramsey Categories: Historical Philosophy,...
- Mengzi's Moral Psychology, Part 1: The Four Moral Sprouts
Author: John Ramsey Categories: Historical Philosophy,...
- David Hume
Oct 29, 2004 · Hume famously sets himself in opposition to most moral philosophers, ancient and modern, who talk of the combat of passion and reason, and who urge human beings to regulate their actions by reason and to grant it dominion over their contrary passions.
It is commonly understood that "reasonable" persons think before acting, whereas "passionate" (emotional) people, act without thinking. So, "reason" is associated with logical, methodical, reasonable. "passion" is associated with emotional, illogical, unreasonable.
Oct 25, 2017 · Where a passion is neither founded on false suppositions, nor chuses means insufficient for the end, the understanding can neither justify nor condemn it. It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger.
Aug 11, 2024 · We speak not strictly and philosophically when we talk of the combat of passion and of reason. Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.
This chapter examines Hume's account of the passions and moral judgement. It attempts to place in perspective two of Hume's most celebrated themes: that reason is the slave of the passions, and that moral distinctions are not derived from reason.
People also ask
Is passion contrary to reason?
What is the difference between reason and passion?
Is reason a slave of passions?
Can a passion be unreasonable?
Can a passion be opposed by Truth and reason?
Are passions rational or irrational?
Nothing can oppose or retard the impulse of passion, but a contrary impulse; and if this contrary impulse ever arises from reason, that latter faculty must have an original influence on the will, and must be able to cause, as well as hinder any act of volition.