Yahoo Web Search

  1. Save Time Editing Documents. No Installation Needed. Try Now!

    30 Days Free Trial - From $0.00 - View more items

Search results

  1. The Lord of Non-Contradiction: An Argument for God from Logic. James N. Anderson and Greg Welty. What is the relationship between the laws of logic and the existence of God?

    • 238KB
    • 22
  2. Anderson located the rise of national identities within a long-evolving crisis of dynastic conceptions of identity, time, and space, and argued print-capitalism was the key cultural and economic force in the genesis of nations. This article offers a critical appropriation and application of Anderson's theory through two steps.

    • Appeals to Inconceivability in Metaphysics
    • What Exactly Is Inconceivable?
    • The Neutrality of Their Argument

    Firstly, on premise 1, in contrast to their ‘widely-shared intuition’, conceivability seems to us to be a dubious guide to metaphysical possibility. The issue we have is general and applies to all ‘appeals to inconceivability’ in metaphysics. Put simply, even granting realism for the moment, the problem with such appeals to inconceivability is that...

    But let us suppose we grant that conceivability is a reliable guide to metaphysical modality. It is still questionable whether what Anderson and Welty find hard to imagine is even relevant to the question of non-contradiction. They say: ‘We cannot imagine a possible world in which the law of noncontradiction is false … Now you may insist that you c...

    In the introduction to their paper, Anderson and Welty attempt to pre-empt a response about alternative laws of logic by saying that their argument is not dependent in any way on the choice of the three classical laws (identity, excluded middle and non-contradiction). They say: ‘It must be granted that even these three time-honored principles are n...

    • Alex Malpass
    • a.p.malpass@gmail.com
    • 2021
  3. A Defense of a Theistic Argument from the Law of Non-Contradiction. My thesis is that there is a defensible argument for the existence of God from the necessary existence of the Law of Non-Contradiction (LNC). James N. Anderson and Greg A. Welty (A&W) offer such an….

  4. James N. Anderson & Greg Welty. Philosophia Christi 13 (2):321 - 338 (2011) Copy BIBTEX. Abstract. In this paper we offer a new argument for the existence of God.

    • James N. Anderson, Greg Welty
    • 2011
  5. Jun 3, 2022 · Subjecthood as a phenomenon contained a basic contradiction and ambiguity. Given the realm was an inherited entity, historically inseparable from the existence of royal authority, how could subjects profess loyalty and duty to the political community without simultaneously recognising the absolute jurisdiction of the monarch? While this logic ...

  6. People also ask

  7. Jul 11, 2020 · PDF. James Anderson and Greg Welty have resurrected an argument for God’s existence (Anderson and Welty 2011 ), which we will call the argument from logic. We present three lines of response against the argument, involving the notion of necessity involved, the notion of intentionality involved, and then we pose a dilemma for divine conceptualism.

  1. People also search for