Search results
therefore, Anderson's implicit theory of the nation rests on a contradiction. At best, his argument, in being only implicit, may be immune to criticism on theoretical grounds but would then be of marginal relevance to theories of nations and national-ism. Rational Choosers Readers expecting to find a tight theoretical argument in Laitin's ...
Oct 3, 2014 · Anderson argues that integration is central to democracy because it fosters democratic values of collective practical intelligence, accountability, and equality.[2] Anderson makes her case for these claims through an examination of Black individuals’ struggle for racial equality in the United States.
Overall, Anderson seeks to develop a ‘discursive theory of democracy’ that focuses on the development of linguistic practices and their effects on the construction of social and political identities.
Jul 27, 2006 · This brief outline of normative democratic theory focuses attention on seven related issues. First, it proposes a definition of democracy. Second, it outlines different approaches to the question of why democracy is morally valuable at all.
Jul 25, 2019 · Brian Wong, the Editor-in-Chief of the Oxford Political Review, speaks to Elizabeth Anderson, political theorist renowned for a diverse range of works, including her theorisation of relational egalitarianism and an institutionalist approach to epistemic justice.
Aug 1, 2020 · Similarly, Anderson describes democracy “as an institution for pooling widely distributed information about problems and policies of public interest by engaging the participation of epistemically diverse knowers” (2006, p. 8). She identifies three “constitutive features” of democracy—its commitment to diversity, discussion, and ...
Sep 13, 2019 · Anderson wants to end oppression by creating communities “in which people stand in relations of equality” to one another. Her thinking is rooted in numerous grassroots egalitarian movements, such as the civil rights, womens’, and disability rights movements.
People also ask
Are democratic institutions morally superior to non-democratic alternatives?
Why does Anderson reject policies that demean?
Is democracy a concept or a theory?
Does a neo-Peircean account of truth have a relation to democracy?
What is the connection between truth and Democracy?
Can a person be committed to the truth without a democracy?
