Search results
Generalising, the difference between the two kinds of meaning is this: it is consistent with something's having non-natural meaning that what it non-naturally means is false; but it is not consistent with something's having natural meaning that what it naturally means is false.
- Hide Tip
Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite...
- Hide Tip
Communication, non-natural meaning, is about the recognition and expression of intentions. Context plays a very important role here. As listeners, we normally use the context in which a sentence is used to extrapolate its meaning, in other words the intentions of the speaker.
I am currently reading "Meaning" and "Logic and Conversation" by Paul Grice. I find it a little difficult to differentiate clearly between his concepts "natural meaning", "non-natural meaning", "conventional implicature" and "generalized conversational implicature". So far this is what I gathered:
One criterion for distinguishing natural from non-natural uses of ‘means’ is that x meansn p entails p, whereas x meansnn p does not. E.g., the fact that that smoke means fire entails that there exists some fire, and the fact that her spots mean measles entails that she has measles.
- 60KB
- 4
Natural and Non-Natural Meaning. Grice begins by making an important distinction between two species of meaning that it is particularly easy to confuse, which he labels natural meaning and non-natural meaning. (a) Those spots on your face mean you have measles.
- 82KB
- 3
Such a semantics focuses on the use of language to communicate. Hence Grice begins with an attempt to isolate a particular kind of meaning, which he calls ‘communicative meaning’, or ‘nonnatural meaning’ (meaningNN). NATURAL VS. NON-NATURAL MEANING.
People also ask
What is the difference between natural and non-natural meaning?
How does Grice distinguish natural meaning and non-natural meaning?
What is Grice's distinction between conventional and natural meaning?
What are non linguistic parallels?
What is natural meaning?
Are explicit linguistic intentions rare?
When the expressions are used in the kind of way in which they are used in the second set of sentences, I shall speak of the sense, or senses, in which they are used, as the nonnatural sense, or senses, of the expressions in question. I shall use the abbreviation "meansNN" to distinguish the nonnatural sense or senses.