Search results
Nov 17, 2018 · In After God: Morality & Bioethics in a Secular Age, Professor H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. argues that the now dominant intellectual culture of the West actively shuns any transcendent point of orientation, such as an appeal to God or to a God’s eye perspective on reality.
- Mark J Cherry
- 2018
- I. Introduction: An Outlook on The Book
- II. The Growth of Atheism and The Great Change in Morality and Bioethics
- III. Why The New Situation Is Supposed to Be So Troublesome
- IV. An Examination of Engelhardt’s First Concern
- V. An Examination of Engelhardt’s Second Worry
- VI. An Examination of Engelhardt’s Third Worry
Engelhardt’s After God is a thick (454 pages) and wonderful book, which gives a comprehensive perspective on the deepest and hardest issues in both moral philosophy and bioethics of our times. It should be clear that “bioethics” indicates not only the simple analysis of a list of issues, such as whether abortion (or euthanasia, etc.) is to be prohi...
Engelhardt remarks that when he arrived in Italy for the first time, in the spring of 1954, “The moral and metaphysical texture of the then-dominant life-world was radically different [from now]. There was a pronounced folk piety” (2017, 57) and in that world “even within the public square one could still speak of sin” (2017, 59). In contrast, and ...
A recurrent thesis of Engelhardt’s book is that “never before has there been a large-scale, politically established culture that explicitly acted as if God did not exist . . . No culture like this existed before the 20th century” (2017, 28). For Engelhardt, this seems to be great trouble: something of which to be scared. However, at least prima fac...
The first (and major) concern that Engelhardt suggests is that without God everything is meaningless. As we have seen in the now-dominant culture in the West, “[a]ll is to be regarded as if ultimately coming from nowhere, going nowhere, and for no enduring purpose” (Engelhardt, 2017, 28). This is the reason for so much social discomfort and disappo...
Engelhardt’s second grand worry is about the nature of morality itself. In a society after God, in which “the dominant secular culture positively eschews any grounding in the transcendent,” it makes no sense and it is impossible to speak of sin in the public square (Engelhardt, 2017, 58). He says: In the now-dominant culture after God, “the secular...
We have seen that for Engelhardt secularization produced the now-dominant secular culture in which everything is meaningless and where morality has collapsed. The next step of Engelhardt’s analysis consists of doubts concerning the future of human society itself. As I hinted, he never makes it explicit, but in several passages, he alludes to this p...
- Mori, Maurizio
Jun 8, 2017 · In The Foundations of Christian Bioethics, Engelhardt presents a bioethics that binds Orthodox Christian moral friends. After God shows itself more pessimistic about the possibility of a merely formal morality of moral friends and calls traditional Christians to wage a culture war.
- Luca Savarino
- 2017
As Engelhardt argues, “Even in his youth, Hegel understood that religion transformed by the Enlightenment no longer needed a transcendent God. The Enlightenment created a culture predicated on the irrelevance of a living, personal God” (2000, 96).
- Mark J. Cherry
- markc@stedwards.edu
- 2015
Nov 17, 2018 · Although the book is an intelligent critique of contemporary moral philosophy in favor of a kind of traditionalism rooted in the perspective of the Orthodox Church, containing numerous forceful arguments, I ultimately disagree with Engelhardt on several main points stemming from his pessimistic view of our current culture and society.
- Maurizio Mori
- 2018
In After God: Morality and Bioethics in a Secular Age, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. explores the broad implications for moral reasoning once a culture has lost a God’s-eye perspective.
People also ask
How does Engelhardt conclude after God?
What does Engelhardt say about bioethics?
Why did Engelhardt and Pellegrino start the journal?
Is Engelhardt correct about secularization?
Are We after God?
Does Engelhardt undermine purely rationalistic ethics?
Dec 29, 2015 · Many of the assumptions on which Engelhardt bases his conclusion about the impossibility of a content-full secular bioethics are problematic: (1) by starting with the notion of moral strangers, there is no possibility, by definition, for a content-full moral discourse among moral strangers.
