Search results
Among experts, the question of the “reality” of Prakrit, or Sanskrit for that matter, has been debated for more than a century: where, when, and among whom did these languages exist, and what was their mode of exis-tence? Were they spoken or written, natural or artificial?
The aesthetics of Prakrit literature had an enormous influence on Sanskrit writings, and Prakrit textual evidences by throwing light on the sociocultural forces in the ancient and medieval Indian society acted as supplementary sources of information for the reconstruction of Indian history.
How can we characterize Prakrit, as a language and as a literary tradition? The most straightforward answer might be to provide a systematic account of its dif-ferences from other languages, and specifically from Sanskrit. For Sanskrit and Prakrit are sister languages: we recognize one by contrast with the other. Prakrit
Language of the Snakes traces the history of the Prakrit language as a literary phenomenon, starting from its cultivation in courts of the Deccan in the first centuries of the common era.
- Andrew Strand Ollett
- 2017
Whether highfalutin poetic theory or nitty-gritty Pāṇinian grammatical analysis, whether Mahābhārata or Madhyamaka, the wide range of Sanskrit literature is presented to us alongside the various scholastic arts that make it up—sometimes with near-giddy enthusiasm.
INTRODUCTION. The most straightforward way to determine what Prakrit was is to look at how it was represented, that is, how it appeared from within the literary and intellectual culture of premodern India. Chapters 2 and 3 ofered a largely diachronic account of Prakrit’s invention as a literary language.
People also ask
How did Prakrit influence Sanskrit literature?
When did Prakrit become a language?
Why is Prakrit a different language than Sanskrit?
Was Prakrit based on literary practices?
Are Sanskrit and Prakrit a cultural history of language?
What is the meaning of 'Sanskrit' and 'Prakrit'?
Prakrit is shown to have played a critical role in the establishment of the cultural-political formation now called the “Sanskrit cosmopolis,” as shown through a genealogy of its two key practices, courtly literature (kāvya-) and royal eulogy (praśasti-).