Search results
In its report of 7 April 1993 (Article 31) (art. 31), it expressed the opinion, by twelve votes to six, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) taken alone and, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 (art. 14+8).
Oct 27, 1994 · Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands. Document source: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights. Date: 27 October 1994.
Jun 4, 2022 · Kroon And Others v The Netherlands: ECHR 27 Oct 1994. Neither marriage nor living together were necessarily a requirement for establishing family ties, exceptionally other factors may . . serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto ‘family ties’.
The HUDOC database provides access to the case-law of the Court (Grand Chamber, Chamber and Committee judgments and decisions, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries from the Case-Law Information Note), the European Commission of Human Rights (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions)
The Commission noted the long-standing relationship between Mrs Kroon and Mr Zerrouk and the fact that it was not disputed that not only was the latter the biological father of Samir but also three other children had been born of that relationship.
- Cris Bc
Kroon and Others v the Netherlands. European Court of Human Rights. By Robyn Emerton, Kirstine Adams, Andrew Byrnes, Jane Connors. Book International Women's Rights Cases. Click here to navigate to parent product. Edition 1st Edition. First Published 2005.
People also ask
Why did Mrs Kroon and Mr Zerrouk get divorced?
What did Mrs Kroon and Mr Zerrouk do?
Is there a family tie between Mr Zerrouk and Mrs Kroon?
Who is Mrs Kroon's husband Ali Zerrouk?
Did Mrs Kroon have a child?
Who was Mrs Kroon's husband Omar m'hallem-Driss?
Oct 27, 1994 · The divorce became absolute on 4 July 1988. Mrs Kroon and Mr Zerrouk then applied to have the parentage of the child recognized as theirs. The Dutch courts refused the application because, under Dutch law as it then stood, the child was the legitimate child of Mrs Kroon and Mr M'Hallem-Driss.
